Re: [review] sendfile / sendfile_sync refactoring

2013-11-28 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:36:44AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi, Here's part #2 in my sendfile refactoring. This is a little more intrusive than the first patch. http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/netflix/20131126-sendfile-sync-refactor-2.diff sf_buf.h is for sf buffers, and not for

Re: [review] sendfile / sendfile_sync refactoring

2013-11-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, It's definitely a work in progress, as you've observed. On 28 November 2013 00:20, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:36:44AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi, Here's part #2 in my sendfile refactoring. This is a little more intrusive than the first

[review] sendfile / sendfile_sync refactoring

2013-11-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, Here's part #2 in my sendfile refactoring. This is a little more intrusive than the first patch. http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/netflix/20131126-sendfile-sync-refactor-2.diff My aim here is to move the sendfile_sync stuff out of uipc_syscalls.c and out of sendfile-only code and into