On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:05 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:29:32 pm Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> would anyone object to the following patch?
>
> I think this is fine.
>
> While you are at it, can you test this patch to remove D_NEEDGIANT?
>
> Index: subr_devstat
On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:29:32 pm Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> hello,
>
> would anyone object to the following patch?
I think this is fine.
While you are at it, can you test this patch to remove D_NEEDGIANT?
Index: subr_devstat.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Adding phk@ to cc since the 400 is from his changeset (r112001).
On 03/18/14 12:29, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> hello,
>
> would anyone object to the following patch?
>
> ==
>
> Index: subr_devstat.c
>
hello,
would anyone object to the following patch?
==
Index: subr_devstat.c
===
--- subr_devstat.c (revision 263311)
+++ subr_devstat.c (working copy)
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@
mtx_assert(&devstat_mutex, MA_NOTOWNED);
if (!once) {
m
