Re: DDB patches

t 11:17, Pedro Giffuni <p...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hello; >>> >>>> Il giorno 19/nov/2015, alle ore 02:34, Dan Partelly >>>> <dan_parte...@rdsor.ro> ha scritto: >>>> >>>> Hey Pedro, >>

Re: DDB patches

On 11/20/15 08:54, Dan Partelly wrote: Hi Pedro, I think you confuse blackmailing with something much simpler and pragmatic. One needs to asses how things work in your project for real before investing too much time. A template for blackmailing is usually in the form: "I will do this

Re: DDB patches

> A template for blackmailing is usually in the form: > > "I will do this (usually involving saving the world and/or your > evidently miserable life) but first you will have to do this > (unrelated) thing to see that you are worthy.” It is interesting how much you dwell on this. I just told

Re: DDB patches

On 11/20/2015 11:28 AM, Dan Partelly wrote: A template for blackmailing is usually in the form: "I will do this (usually involving saving the world and/or your evidently miserable life) but first you will have to do this (unrelated) thing to see that you are worthy.” It is interesting how

Re: DDB patches

Hello; > Il giorno 19/nov/2015, alle ore 02:34, Dan Partelly <dan_parte...@rdsor.ro> > ha scritto: > > Hey Pedro, > > some times ago you got some DDB patches from me in which I added relational > ops support from it. The patch was a bit clobbered, > but last I

Re: DDB patches

Dan Partelly <dan_parte...@rdsor.ro> >> ha scritto: >> >> Hey Pedro, >> >> some times ago you got some DDB patches from me in which I added relational >> ops support from it. The patch was a bit clobbered, >> but last I know you cleaned it up and p

Re: DDB patches

[snip snip snippety snip] Hi Dan! Yeah, turns out trying to get a bunch of burnt out, time-poor developers with commit bits to commit stuff will typically end up with (a) things getting neglected, or (b) getting you a commit bit. :) Please grab the patch from pedro (which I reviewed, and it

Re: DDB patches

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Dan Partelly wrote: >> Unlike what you suggest here, I see lots of issues in Bugzilla which >> exactly what you describe: enhancements on already available tools. >> I've even submitted a few myself. > > Thats great Willem. > > But no matter

Re: DDB patches

2015, at 11:17, Pedro Giffuni <p...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> >> Hello; >> >>> Il giorno 19/nov/2015, alle ore 02:34, Dan Partelly <dan_parte...@rdsor.ro> >>> ha scritto: >>> >>> Hey Pedro, >>> >>> some times

Re: DDB patches

she receives criticism or has plans that do not match > ours. > If this is not your ideal workflow … fork your own BSD, a lot of > intelligent > people do just that. > > Pedro. > >> >> Dan >> >> >> >>> On 19 Nov 2015, at 11:17, Pedro Giff

Re: DDB patches

ry code reuse. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [qute from libxo thread ] >>>>>>> It's all fine and good making technical decisions based on >>>>>>> drawings and handwaving and philosophizing, but at some point >>>&g

Re: DDB patches

ame up with a solution >>>> that >> >> Once I see how things work around here once someone wrote the code, >> and get this done one way or another , we could proceed to the >> libification of ifconfig, should you so desire, and you believe we >> can all benefit from it. &

Re: DDB patches

bsd.org> wrote: > >> >> Hello; >> >>> Il giorno 19/nov/2015, alle ore 02:34, Dan Partelly >>> <dan_parte...@rdsor.ro> ha scritto: >>> >>> Hey Pedro, >>> >>> some times ago you got some DDB patches from me in

Re: DDB patches

gt; drawings and handwaving and philosophizing, but at some point >>>>>> someone has to do the code. The reason is simple - someone >>>>>> offered to do the work and push it through. This isn't a >>>>>> commercial thing where we get to make project >>

Re: DDB patches

>> that >>> >>> Once I see how things work around here once someone wrote the code, >>> and get this done one way or another , we could proceed to the >>> libification of ifconfig, should you so desire, and you believe we >>> can all benefit from

DDB patches

Hey Pedro, some times ago you got some DDB patches from me in which I added relational ops support from it. The patch was a bit clobbered, but last I know you cleaned it up and put it somewhere on freebsd.org (prolly your page) up for review. Could you or Adrian review the patch set