FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT on ARM: performance and load average

2014-09-20 Thread Maxim V FIlimonov
Hello everyone, Recently, I encountered a problem with -CURRENT on an ARM board (cubieboard2 to be precise). The problem was that the load average was above 2. Including the fact that the board has 2 CPU cores, that's strange. Also, the network throughput was way too slow: from 3 kilobytes per

FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT on ARM: performance and load average

2014-09-20 Thread Maxim V FIlimonov
Hello everyone, Recently, I encountered a problem with -CURRENT on an ARM board (cubieboard2 to be precise). The problem was that the load average was above 2. Including the fact that the board has 2 CPU cores, that's strange. Also, the network throughput was way too slow: from 3 kilobytes per

Re: FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT on ARM: performance and load average

2014-09-20 Thread Ian Lepore
On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 22:44 +0400, Maxim V FIlimonov wrote: Hello everyone, Recently, I encountered a problem with -CURRENT on an ARM board (cubieboard2 to be precise). The problem was that the load average was above 2. Including the fact that the board has 2 CPU cores, that's strange.

Re: FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT on ARM: performance and load average

2014-09-20 Thread Maxim V FIlimonov
On Saturday 20 September 2014 13:24:08 Ian Lepore wrote: Since it's happening only on that hardware, there's a good chance the problem is in the allwinner a10/a20 clock driver, not in the general eventtimer code. In fact, looking at the code it appears that a divide-by-16 is being set in the

Re: FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT on ARM: performance and load average

2014-09-20 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Maxim V FIlimonov (c...@bein.link) wrote: Recently, I encountered a problem with -CURRENT on an ARM board (cubieboard2 to be precise). The problem was that the load average was above 2. Including the fact that the board has 2 CPU cores, that's strange. Also, the network throughput was