Hi re@
cc stable@ current@ etc,
Ref. my Fri Dec 27 15:25:57 UTC 2013
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-December/076604.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-December/047555.html
Has someone checked src/ + ports/ has been re-made a seamless
On 12/27/13, Mathieu Arnold m...@freebsd.org wrote:
+--On 27 décembre 2013 00:42:36 +0100 Zenny garbytr...@gmail.com wrote:
| Much awaited release, thanks!. However, does the freebsd-update from
| the earlier version bork in case of ZFS on Root? Or is there a safe
| way to upgrade without
+--On 27 décembre 2013 12:26:49 +0100 Zenny garbytr...@gmail.com wrote:
| On 12/27/13, Mathieu Arnold m...@freebsd.org wrote:
| +--On 27 décembre 2013 00:42:36 +0100 Zenny garbytr...@gmail.com
| wrote:
| | Much awaited release, thanks!. However, does the freebsd-update from
| | the earlier version
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:25:21AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
[...]
Pre-installed virtual machine images for 10.0-RC3 are also available
for amd64 and i386 architectures.
The images are located under the 'snapshots' directory on FTP, here:
The third RC build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available
Nice :-)
Has someone checked src/ + ports/ has been re-made a seamless
functional combination for named/bind ? There were various loose
ends earlier (paths, defaults etc), after removal from src/.
I'm asking as I think I
All the examples I've seen for updating bootcode assume GPT. If one has MBR
(as I do) and assuming the following basic scheme:
gpart show ada0
= 63 976773105 ada0 MBR (466G)
63 976773105 1 freebsd [active] (466G)
gpart show ada0s1
=0 976773105 ada0s1 BSD
+--On 27 décembre 2013 10:28:07 -0500 Thomas Hoffmann trh...@gmail.com
wrote:
| All the examples I've seen for updating bootcode assume GPT. If one has
| MBR (as I do) and assuming the following basic scheme:
|
| gpart show ada0
| = 63 976773105 ada0 MBR (466G)
| 63 976773105
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 27 décembre 2013 10:28:07 -0500 Thomas Hoffmann trh...@gmail.com
wrote:
| All the examples I've seen for updating bootcode assume GPT. If one has
| MBR (as I do) and assuming the following basic scheme:
|
| gpart show ada0
| = 63 976773105
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 03:33:23PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus:
All you have to do is adapt it to run your particular setup,
replacing da0 with the correct disk (and running it for each disk
where your pool is, in my case, it was mfid0 and mfid1.)
I've
+--On 27 décembre 2013 10:17:14 -0600 Matthew D. Fuller
fulle...@over-yonder.net wrote:
| On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 03:33:23PM +0100 I heard the voice of
| Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus:
|
| All you have to do is adapt it to run your particular setup,
| replacing da0 with the correct disk
After I posted, it occurred to me to check out the
../bsdinstall/scripts/zfsboot script to see how the boot code was laid
down when the MBR was created. It shows only:
dd if=/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/ada0s1 count =1
But, adding to my confusion, the FreeBSD wiki for ZFS on root (MBR-style)
shows
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 05:21:12PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus:
You *don't* need it after installworld, or freebsd-update install.
You *only* need it if you *explicitly* run zpool upgrade
yourzpool.
Well, that was my point; by removing the need to have to
On Friday, December 27, 2013 11:08:08 am Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 27 décembre 2013 10:28:07 -0500 Thomas Hoffmann trh...@gmail.com
wrote:
| All the examples I've seen for updating bootcode assume GPT. If one has
| MBR (as I do) and assuming
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 27 décembre 2013 10:28:07 -0500 Thomas Hoffmann trh...@gmail.com
wrote:
| All the examples I've seen for updating bootcode assume GPT. If one has
| MBR (as I do) and
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote:
The correct way to install/update ZFS Boot code on an MBR disk is:
Install boot Manager (required on first install)
# gpart bootcode -b /boot/boot0 ad0
Note: /boot/mbr could also be used if you are not multibooting
The third RC build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and
sparc64 architectures.
The image checksums follow at the end of this email.
ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images
are
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
The third RC build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available
on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and
sparc64 architectures.
The image checksums follow at the end of this email.
ISO
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 04:17:27PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote:
I take it that building world and kernel from source should present no
problems, right?
Is the latest CLang at 3.5 being used or will I need to hack the Makefile
in /usr/ports/lang to build it?
Both world and kernel are built with
Much awaited release, thanks!. However, does the freebsd-update from
the earlier version bork in case of ZFS on Root? Or is there a safe
way to upgrade without borking. I had a very bad experience when I
upgraded from FreeBSD-10B3 to RC1. Thanks!
On 12/26/13, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
+--On 27 décembre 2013 00:42:36 +0100 Zenny garbytr...@gmail.com wrote:
| Much awaited release, thanks!. However, does the freebsd-update from
| the earlier version bork in case of ZFS on Root? Or is there a safe
| way to upgrade without borking. I had a very bad experience when I
| upgraded from
20 matches
Mail list logo