I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and amd64, but
that was yesterday.
I looked later during the day and found the BETA3 for i386 and amd64.
Now the question is how to update without trashing the BETA2
2011/9/28 Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net:
I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and amd64,
but that was yesterday.
I looked later during the day and found the BETA3 for i386 and amd64.
Now the
On 28/09/2011 10:28, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and amd64,
but that was yesterday.
I looked later during the day and found the BETA3 for i386 and amd64.
Yup. The stable/9
Hi,
On 9/28/11 5:28 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and amd64,
but that was yesterday.
I looked later during the day and found the BETA3 for i386 and amd64.
I've been
I see a thread, FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems. and now am curious about
what is the current beta?
I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and amd64.
Maybe the burncd problem, not working on SATA, is a temporary
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:06:53 + (GMT), Thomas Mueller wrote:
I see a thread, FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems. and now am
curious about what is the current beta?
I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and
