Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > < said:
> > > You're not one for constructive criticism, are you? I don't know how
> > What part of YOU MAY NOT CLAIM COPYRIGHT ON MY TEXT don't you
> > understand?
> That's a technicality, and I'll f
Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> < said:
> > You're not one for constructive criticism, are you? I don't know how
> What part of YOU MAY NOT CLAIM COPYRIGHT ON MY TEXT don't you
> understand?
That's a technicality, and I'll fix it in a second. I'm still waiting
for a list of actual p
< said:
> You're not one for constructive criticism, are you? I don't know how
What part of YOU MAY NOT CLAIM COPYRIGHT ON MY TEXT don't you
understand?
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> < said:
> > I've replaced fetch(1) with a libfetch-based implementation.
> It introduces numerous style bugs in both code and documentation, and
> furthermore claims copyright on text in the manual page which I
> wrote. It also removes support for a n
< said:
> I've replaced fetch(1) with a libfetch-based implementation.
It introduces numerous style bugs in both code and documentation, and
furthermore claims copyright on text in the manual page which I
wrote. It also removes support for a number of important features.
On the positive site, i
(sorry for not posting this immediately after the commit)
I've replaced fetch(1) with a libfetch-based implementation. It should
support all the flags the old implementation does, except for -h and
-f; if anyone notices something missing or not working as it should,
please notify me as soon as po
