In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> If you really want to background one process from /etc/rc, you would
> still do that by writing a wrapped that catches SIGINT and send
^^^ ^
wrapper shellscri
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Randell Jesup wrote:
> Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >would you please have a look at the following sh fix? My brain is a
> >bit rusty and maybe I overlook a drawback.
> >
> >When a child is receiving SIGSTOP, eval continues with the next
> >command. While
Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>would you please have a look at the following sh fix? My brain is a
>bit rusty and maybe I overlook a drawback.
>
>When a child is receiving SIGSTOP, eval continues with the next
>command. While that is correct for the interactive case (Control-Z
>and
Bruce (or other -currenter's)
would you please have a look at the following sh fix? My brain is a
bit rusty and maybe I overlook a drawback.
When a child is receiving SIGSTOP, eval continues with the next
command. While that is correct for the interactive case (Control-Z
and you get the prompt
