Re: Tonights panic: free_newdirblk+0x73: movl %eax,0x10(%e

2001-05-24 Thread Michael Harnois
On Wed, 23 May 2001 22:10:09 -0300 (ADT), The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Oops ... neat, now it just locked up solid and ctl-alt-esc doesn't even get me to debugger :( This has been my experience for about a week on the -current kernel ... I held out high hopes that these

Re: Tonights panic: free_newdirblk+0x73: movl %eax,0x10(%e

2001-05-24 Thread Edwin Culp
Quoting Michael Harnois [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 23 May 2001 22:10:09 -0300 (ADT), The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Oops ... neat, now it just locked up solid and ctl-alt-esc doesn't even get me to debugger :( This has been my experience for about a week on the

Re: Tonights panic: free_newdirblk+0x73: movl %eax,0x10(%e

2001-05-24 Thread John Baldwin
On 24-May-01 Michael Harnois wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2001 22:10:09 -0300 (ADT), The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Oops ... neat, now it just locked up solid and ctl-alt-esc doesn't even get me to debugger :( This has been my experience for about a week on the -current

RE: Tonights panic: free_newdirblk+0x73: movl %eax,0x10(%e

2001-05-23 Thread John Baldwin
On 24-May-01 The Hermit Hacker wrote: Just upgraded to latest sources, doesn't look like the swap issue ... was performing a 'make -j16 buildworld' when it panic'd ... Fataltrap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; lapic.id = fault virtual address = 0x12 fault

RE: Tonights panic: free_newdirblk+0x73: movl %eax,0x10(%e

2001-05-23 Thread The Hermit Hacker
Okay, running a new buildworld right now ... give it a half hour or so :) On Wed, 23 May 2001, John Baldwin wrote: Looks like %edx is 0x2 then. In other post, the faulting va was 0x11 with the same instruction, meaning that %edx is 0x1. So it looks like it isn't a NULL pointer