Re: [CFT][patch] mandoc: don't segfault on empty tbl(1) continuation blocks

2019-07-18 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Baptiste, hi Eygene, Baptiste Daroussin wrote on Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:16:56PM +0200: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:39:42PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: >> but I believe that 'cpp' still can be NULL and will try to see >> if it is triggerable. I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you

Re: [CFT][patch] mandoc: don't segfault on empty tbl(1) continuation blocks

2019-07-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:39:42PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Baptiste, good day. > > Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:12:02AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:31:24PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > > Attached is the patch that makes built-in tbl(1) processor in >

Re: [CFT][patch] mandoc: don't segfault on empty tbl(1) continuation blocks

2019-07-17 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Baptiste, good day. Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:12:02AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:31:24PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > Attached is the patch that makes built-in tbl(1) processor in > > mandoc to avoid dumping core when it renders the table with empty > > "T{

Re: [CFT][patch] mandoc: don't segfault on empty tbl(1) continuation blocks

2019-07-17 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:31:24PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Good day. > > Attached is the patch that makes built-in tbl(1) processor in mandoc > to avoid dumping core when it renders the table with empty "T{ T}" > block and horizontally-ruled table. > > The simplest way to reproduce the