* Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 01:47] wrote:
Hi -current people,
I have recently made some significant changes to the mbuf allocator.
Although I have invested, along with several other developers, very significant
time in testing the newly introduced code, should any
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c references mp_ncpus variable, which is defined only in SMP
case. Should this variable be moved out of #ifdef SMP?
On 22-Jun-2001 Bosko Milekic wrote:
Hi -current people,
I have recently made some
I would think not.
Bosko might be gone now. I'll look at this as soon as a CVS update continues.
It's odd, though. A GENERIC kernel built for me yesterday w/o problems.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:45:50AM -0400, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c references mp_ncpus variable, which is defined only in SMP
case. Should this variable be moved out of #ifdef SMP?
It turns out
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:51:55AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
I would think not.
Bosko might be gone now. I'll look at this as soon as a CVS update continues.
It's odd, though. A GENERIC kernel built for me yesterday w/o problems.
Nah, don't worry. I'm still here (and plan to
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:52:01AM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
If you want accurate stats you should be able to lock the per-cpu
stats areas all at once as long as you always do it in a certain
order, basically, lock CPU 0, then 1, then 2, then 3, sum then
unlock. If correctness doesn't
* Alexander N. Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 10:46] wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c references mp_ncpus variable, which is defined only in SMP
case. Should this variable be moved out of #ifdef SMP?
Yes, I asked for this months
On 22-Jun-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander N. Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 10:46] wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c references mp_ncpus variable, which is defined only in SMP
case. Should this variable be moved out of
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:35:32AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
On 22-Jun-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander N. Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 10:46] wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c references mp_ncpus variable, which is
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:32:21PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
mp_ncpus implies SMP (mp_ prefix). If you want to make it ncpus and move it to
sys/systm.h and stick it somewhere MI initialized to 1 that is fine. Then
hw.ncpus can reference that (well, it's called hw.ncpu right now,
On 22-Jun-01 Bosko Milekic wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:35:32AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
On 22-Jun-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander N. Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 10:46] wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c
11 matches
Mail list logo
