On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:44:34PM -0800, Xin Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we shouldn't save entropy inside jails, as the data is not going
> to be used by rc script (pjd@126744). If there is no objections, I will
> commit this changeset on January 1, 2014.
I agree we shouldn't do it. I have this
On 25 Dec 2013, at 02:04, Xin Li wrote:
> No, we are not talking about removing /var/db/entropy. What I am
> proposing to do is to disable entropy savings from jails. Here is why:
>
> The way a PRNG works is that it uses one or many entropy sources to
> "feed" its internal state, and generate
On Dec 24, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Xin Li wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 12/24/13 14:36, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On Dec 24, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Xin Li wrote:
>>
>>> I think we shouldn't save entropy inside jails, as the data is
>>> not going to be used by rc script (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/24/13 15:26, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Xin Li wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 12/24/13 14:36, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>> On Dec 24, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Xin Li
>>> wrote:
>>>
I
Paul Hoffman wrote this message on Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 15:26 -0800:
> On Dec 24, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Xin Li wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On 12/24/13 14:36, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >> On Dec 24, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Xin Li wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think we shou
On Dec 24, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Xin Li wrote:
> I think we shouldn't save entropy inside jails, as the data is not going
> to be used by rc script (pjd@126744). If there is no objections, I will
> commit this changeset on January 1, 2014.
Even if it is not used by an rc script, it might be used b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/24/13 14:36, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Xin Li wrote:
>
>> I think we shouldn't save entropy inside jails, as the data is
>> not going to be used by rc script (pjd@126744). If there is no
>> objections, I will commi
