Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2014-06-28 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 06/28/14 14:49, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: TB --- 2014-06-28 11:31:03 - tinderbox 2.22 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2014-06-28 11:31:03 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 9.2-STABLE FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #0 r263721: Tue Mar 25 09:27:39 EDT 2014 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-07-11 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, July 11, 2013 3:07:33 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 11 July 2013 00:05, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:38:47PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> I don't get why this is dying. any ideas? > > > > Maybe because sparc64's ucontext.h is getting pulled in, and it has > >

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-07-11 Thread Jackson Donadel
I think it´s in your kernel config file LINT. In your log we can read this Kernel build for LINT started on Thu Jul 11 04:07:01 UTC 2013 I had the same issue with current yesterday. 2013/7/11 Navdeep Parhar > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:07:33AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 11 July 2

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-07-11 Thread Navdeep Parhar
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:07:33AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 11 July 2013 00:05, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:38:47PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> I don't get why this is dying. any ideas? > > > > Maybe because sparc64's ucontext.h is getting pulled in, and it has

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-07-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 11 July 2013 00:05, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:38:47PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> I don't get why this is dying. any ideas? > > Maybe because sparc64's ucontext.h is getting pulled in, and it has > this: > > #define mc_flagsmc_global[0] Ugh, we should fix thi

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-07-11 Thread Navdeep Parhar
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:38:47PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I don't get why this is dying. any ideas? Maybe because sparc64's ucontext.h is getting pulled in, and it has this: #define mc_flagsmc_global[0] Regards, Navdeep > > > > adrian > > On 10 July 2013 21:18, FreeBSD Tinderb

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-07-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
I don't get why this is dying. any ideas? adrian On 10 July 2013 21:18, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2013-07-11 02:56:02 - tinderbox 2.10 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2013-07-11 02:56:02 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE > FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: M

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-03-24 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 3/24/13 12:20 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2013-03-24 06:26:48 - tinderbox 2.10 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-03-24 06:26:48 - FreeBSD > freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: > Mon Mar 26

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-05-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
FreeBSD Tinderbox writes: > /src/lib/libc/net/nsparser.y: In function '_nsaddsrctomap': > /src/lib/libc/net/nsparser.y:169: warning: implicit declaration of function > 'free' > In file included from nsparser.c:398: > /src/lib/libc/../../include/stdlib.h: At top level: > /src/lib/libc/../../includ

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-01-30 Thread Jack Vogel
Someone with sparc build experience want to look at this and maybe see something I'm missing, this error makes no sense to me, these are defined in ixgbe_type.h and I see nothing architecture sensitive?? Jack On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:51 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2012-01-30 17:49:3

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2011-12-18 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 18. Dec 2011, at 18:07 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > FreeBSD Tinderbox writes: >> In file included from /src/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c:400: >> /src/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h: In function 'em_netmap_rxsync': >> /src/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h:332: warning: dereferencing 'void *' >> pointe

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2011-12-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
FreeBSD Tinderbox writes: > In file included from /src/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c:400: > /src/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h: In function 'em_netmap_rxsync': > /src/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h:332: warning: dereferencing 'void *' > pointer > /src/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h:332: error: request for

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2011-08-08 Thread Adrian Chadd
As mentioned in the related commit, this was my fault, and I'm sorry! Sean emailed me this a few minutes after I committed it, and I fixed it shortly after. I guess tinderbox got lucky :) I'll be more careful in the future with this conditional debugging stuff. Adrian On 9 August 2011 04:33, F

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2011-06-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:34 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2011-06-30 21:40:13 - tinderbox 2.7 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2011-06-30 21:40:13 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 > TB --- 2011-06-30 21:40:13 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2011-06-30

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2011-06-16 Thread Tai-hwa Liang
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:36 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: TB --- 2011-06-16 04:08:45 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-16 04:08:45 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 [...] cc -O2 -pipe �-ffreestanding

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2011-06-16 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:36 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2011-06-16 04:08:45 - tinderbox 2.7 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2011-06-16 04:08:45 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 > TB --- 2011-06-16 04:08:45 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2011-06-16

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2011-03-31 Thread Adrian Chadd
.. I fixed it by just disabling building the ath_ahb module for now. Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-09-19 Thread Mike Tancsa
Sorry for the tinderbox breakagage again. Our main cvsup server seems to be triggering a bug in the em driver :( I will point it to an outside mirror for now... ---Mike At 12:38 PM 9/19/2010, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: TB --- 2010-09-19 16:01:48 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-cur

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-06-18 Thread Rui Paulo
On 18 Jun 2010, at 12:40, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 04:26:19AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: >> TB --- 2010-06-18 03:09:26 - tinderbox 2.6 running on >> freebsd-current.sentex.ca >> TB --- 2010-06-18 03:09:26 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 >> TB --- 20

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-06-18 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 04:26:19AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2010-06-18 03:09:26 - tinderbox 2.6 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2010-06-18 03:09:26 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 > TB --- 2010-06-18 03:09:26 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 201