Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2014-03-14 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Since initial mail http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045911.html did not raise a lot of objection, I'm going to proceed with this. Ditto here -- on the one hand, a shame, and on the other, reality. Remember to also

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2014-03-14 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, On 13 Mar 2014, at 16:43, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi! Since initial mail http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045911.html did not raise a lot of objection, I'm going to proceed with this. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. In which case,

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2014-03-14 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 13 March 2014 20:43, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi! Since initial mail http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045911.html did not raise a lot of objection, I'm going to proceed with this. Would you like to clean up from DECnet as well? :)

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2014-03-14 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 02:31:45PM +0400, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: S On 13 March 2014 20:43, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote: SHi! S SSince initial mail S S http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045911.html S S did not raise a lot of objection, I'm

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2014-03-13 Thread Rui Paulo
On 13 Mar 2014, at 09:43, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi! Since initial mail http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045911.html did not raise a lot of objection, I'm going to proceed with this. OK by me. -- Rui Paulo

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-29 Thread Julian Elischer
On 10/29/13, 3:23 AM, Ian Lepore wrote: On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 19:54 +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote: Am 28.10.2013 um 13:42 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org: The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/, meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-28 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, On 28 Oct 2013, at 12:42, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Hello! [Cc to stable@, for wider audience] The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/, meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would be shipped without them. 1) AppleTalk Last

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-28 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 10/28/13 07:42, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Hello! [Cc to stable@, for wider audience] The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/, meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would be shipped without them. 1) AppleTalk Last time claimed

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-28 Thread Julian Elischer
On 10/28/13 8:42 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Hello! [Cc to stable@, for wider audience] The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/, meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would be shipped without them. 1) AppleTalk Last time claimed

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-28 Thread drosih
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:28:07 EDT Julian Elischer wrote: On 10/28/13 8:42 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/, meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE (available in couple of years) would be shipped without them. 1) AppleTalk

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-28 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:49:14PM -0400, dro...@rpi.edu wrote: d As far as the kernel-level support, I assume you're just removing all d the code tied to the kernel options NETATALK and NETATALKDEBUG? Or does d it entail some other changes, which might wreck my custom compile of CAP? Yes, that

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-28 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 28.10.2013 um 13:42 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org: The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/, meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would be shipped without them. 1) AppleTalk Last time claimed to be supported by

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-28 Thread Ian Lepore
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 19:54 +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote: Am 28.10.2013 um 13:42 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org: The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/, meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would be shipped without them.

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-28 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi, all, Am 28.10.2013 um 17:49 schrieb dro...@rpi.edu: I notice that CAP was removed from the ports collection some time ago, and that there didn't seem to be any objections to that. So that's some more indication that appletalk isn't seeing much use. I’d guess the main reason is that Apple

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-28 Thread Tom Samplonius
On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote: Am 28.10.2013 um 13:42 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org: The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/, meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would be shipped without

Re: [heads up] axing AppleTalk and IPX/SPX

2013-10-28 Thread Gary Palmer
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:12:21PM -0700, Tom Samplonius wrote: On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote: Am 28.10.2013 um 13:42 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org: The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/, meaning that