Re: [patch] netinet6/ip6_fw.c: use syslog for logging

2001-06-24 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO

>>> Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:06:34 +0900,
>>> Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

kuriyama> I found logs from ipfw(8) and ip6fw(8) are stored to different place.
kuriyama> Former one is into  via syslog(3) but latter one is
kuriyama> into  via kernel printf().

kuriyama> The reason of this difference is came from missing "merge from
kuriyama> ip_fw.c".  And I hope this patch will be first step to synchronize
kuriyama> ip_fw.c and ip6_fw.c.

kuriyama> So, I made a patch to merge the difference revision 1.117 and 1.118 of
kuriyama> ip_fw.c into ip6_fw.c to use syslog(3) interface for ip6fw(8) logging.

It seems fine to me.

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: [patch] netinet6/ip6_fw.c: use syslog for logging

2001-06-22 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO

>>> Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:06:34 +0900,
>>> Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

kuriyama> I found logs from ipfw(8) and ip6fw(8) are stored to different place.
kuriyama> Former one is into  via syslog(3) but latter one is
kuriyama> into  via kernel printf().

kuriyama> The reason of this difference is came from missing "merge from
kuriyama> ip_fw.c".  And I hope this patch will be first step to synchronize
kuriyama> ip_fw.c and ip6_fw.c.

kuriyama> So, I made a patch to merge the difference revision 1.117 and 1.118 of
kuriyama> ip_fw.c into ip6_fw.c to use syslog(3) interface for ip6fw(8) logging.

kuriyama> Please review this patch carefully because I'm not kernel hacker.

  Okay, I'll take a look this.

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message