On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:41:54AM -0400, John De Boskey wrote:
- Ruslan Ermilov's Original Message -
No, I have nothing in my environment that should affect the
build, no /etc/make.conf in the chroot area..
But then again: running make rerelease is effectively just
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
...
Forget what I've said about NO_WERROR, it (unfortunately) only
applies to the userland.
Still, running make rerelease KERNEL_FLAGS=WERROR= gets the
release done.
I wondered why I get it, and similarly my nigthly buildkernel
completed without
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:14:17AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
...
Forget what I've said about NO_WERROR, it (unfortunately) only
applies to the userland.
Still, running make rerelease KERNEL_FLAGS=WERROR= gets the
release done.
I
In the last episode (Jul 29), Ruslan Ermilov said:
Hm, I always thought that -O2 and -Os are just useful aliases that in
effect only turn a few dozens of -f optimization flags, and that
switching some of them off later is allowed. I.e., -Os
-fno-strict-aliasing should work.
That does work,
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:14:17AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
...
Forget what I've said about NO_WERROR, it (unfortunately) only
applies to the userland.
Still, running make rerelease
