Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-16 Thread Nate Lawson
(To recap: I'm having ACPI problems on a DFI CD70-SC, with both 5.1-R and 5-CURRENT. Booting GENERIC doesn't show any problems, however, so there's a good chance it's a misconfiguration issue.) Thus spake Damian Gerow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/09/03 17:34]: It's attached. There's no APM in

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-16 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16/09/03 15:00]: I'm almost certain your problem is defining MAXMEM to 512 MB. Remove that from your kernel config and try again. MAXMEM causes all kinds of problems. If this doesn't solve it, start with the stock GENERIC and add back in your

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT [SOLVED]

2003-09-16 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Damian Gerow wrote: Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16/09/03 15:00]: I'm almost certain your problem is defining MAXMEM to 512 MB. Remove that from your kernel config and try again. MAXMEM causes all kinds of problems. If this doesn't solve it, start with

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT [SOLVED]

2003-09-16 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16/09/03 16:24]: I have no time to track this down but the output of acpidump -t may help someone else who might be interested. You're looking for the pointers that are stored in RSD PTR. I'm still on 5.1-R, and there's no '-t' flag to acpidump.

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT [SOLVED]

2003-09-16 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Damian Gerow wrote: Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [16/09/03 16:24]: I have no time to track this down but the output of acpidump -t may help someone else who might be interested. You're looking for the pointers that are stored in RSD PTR. I'm still on

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-15 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Nate Lawson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13/09/03 14:42]: The post you reference shows the user with a kernel that has both APM and ACPI installed, apparently. This is not valid. Please report your kernel config. If GENERIC in 2003/9/6 booted fine with ACPI and then your rebuilt kernel

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-15 Thread Damian Gerow
(To recap: I'm having ACPI problems on a DFI CD70-SC, with both 5.1-R and 5-CURRENT. Booting GENERIC doesn't show any problems, however, so there's a good chance it's a misconfiguration issue.) Thus spake Damian Gerow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/09/03 17:34]: It's attached. There's no APM in

Re: ACPI problems with this morning's -CURRENT

2003-09-13 Thread Nate Lawson
The post you reference shows the user with a kernel that has both APM and ACPI installed, apparently. This is not valid. Please report your kernel config. If GENERIC in 2003/9/6 booted fine with ACPI and then your rebuilt kernel from 2003/9/7 fails, it is almost certainly the devices you

Re: ACPI problems on MSI K7D

2003-09-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please report the dmesg from boot -v as that should help figure out why pci_cfgregopen() fails. Full log attached, both with and without ACPI. Also, I think the following should be \_S3: Name (\SS3, Package (0x04) That shouldn't have any impact on my

Re: ACPI problems on MSI K7D

2003-09-09 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please report the dmesg from boot -v as that should help figure out why pci_cfgregopen() fails. Full log attached, both with and without ACPI. Perhaps someone who knows our PCI code better

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-08 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote: I have a feeling that my acpi table didn't actually get overridden though, due to the following from dmesg: ACPI: DSDT was overridden. -0424: *** Error: UtAllocate: Could not allocate size 6e49202a ACPI-0428: *** Error: Could

Re: ACPI problems on MSI K7D

2003-09-07 Thread Nate Lawson
This is the line that triggers that panic, from /sys/dev/acpica/Osd/OsdHardware.c: if (pci_cfgregopen() == 0) panic(AcpiOsDerivePciId unable to initialize pci bus); Please report the dmesg from boot -v as that should help figure out why pci_cfgregopen() fails. Also, I think the

RE: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c (fwd)

2003-09-05 Thread Tony Maher
-Houston) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Tony Maher [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Blacquière [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ Subject: RE: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c I got

RE: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Doug Barton
I got interested in this recently because I inherited one of these laptops from work. On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote: Which version of the N610C BIOS are you using? (F.14 is the latest on the hp.com website.) I know that the _OSI(Windows 2001) bug will be fixed in the

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Robert =?unknown-8bit?q?Blacqui=E8re?=
I don't seem to have these problems. I use xbattbar without problem. I use this acpi_dsdt code: http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt.dsl On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 07:50:03PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: I got interested in this recently because I inherited one of these laptops from work. On

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Doug Barton
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Robert [unknown-8bit] Blacquière wrote: I don't seem to have these problems. I use xbattbar without problem. Argh. How recent is your -current? I compile regularly, and I was up to date as of this afternoon. I use this acpi_dsdt code:

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Robert =?unknown-8bit?q?Blacqui=E8re?=
Oeps I've put the old one up... Now ik have the new one. I don't load the VESA modules, it seems these are loaded before acpi code is replaced? Robert On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 01:49:42AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Robert [unknown-8bit] Blacquire wrote: I don't seem to

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Terry Lambert
Doug Barton wrote: I use this acpi_dsdt code: http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt.dsl Thanks for the suggestion... I tried that one, but got the same error about not enough memory to load the override file. I attached a verbose dmesg, just in case someone wants to take a look. | ACPI:

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Doug Barton
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: Doug Barton wrote: I use this acpi_dsdt code: http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt.dsl Thanks for the suggestion... I tried that one, but got the same error about not enough memory to load the override file. I attached a verbose dmesg, just

Re: ACPI problems with Compaq Evo N610c

2003-09-01 Thread Terry Lambert
Doug Barton wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: I attached a verbose dmesg, just in case someone wants to take a look. | ACPI: DSDT was overridden. | -0424: *** Error: UtAllocate: Could not allocate size 50204453 | ACPI-0428: *** Error: Could not allocate table

Re: ACPI problems on Samsung Q10 (AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE /AE_BAD_PARAMETER)

2003-06-23 Thread Eirik Oeverby
Hi, I'm seeing similiar things on my setup - both the ACPI Global Lock messages and the wi0 issues. In fact, the wi driver seems to be incredibly unstable - Every half hour or so I need to remove and re-insert the card to regain network connectivity (and ofcourse killall dhclient ; ifconfig wi0

Re: ACPI problems on Samsung Q10 (AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE /AE_BAD_PARAMETER)

2003-06-23 Thread Hendrik Scholz
Hi! I applied the patch from http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=214877+0+archive/2003/freebsd-current/20030615.freebsd-current and the AE_BAD_PARAEMTER error disappers. Hendrik -- Hendrik Scholz - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://raisdorf.net/ Forcast for tonight: Dark.

Re: ACPI problems on 5.1

2003-06-18 Thread Sid Carter
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:21:41PM +0100, Antony T Curtis wrote: On a Compaq Armada V300 notebook, if I load the acpi module, boot fails after the kernel prints about half a dozen acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR, fails to detect any of the hardware and panics because of failure to mount

Re: ACPI problems on 5.1

2003-06-18 Thread Antony T Curtis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks! I have it working nicely now - without any problems. I decompiled, fixed and compiled... problem sorted :) On Wednesday 18 June 2003 8:58 am, Sid Carter wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:21:41PM +0100, Antony T Curtis wrote: On a Compaq

Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23

2003-06-05 Thread Kevin Oberman
From: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:00:53 -0400 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0069_01C32A80.2F346810 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I

Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23

2003-06-05 Thread Scott Long
Matthew Emmerton wrote: I cvsup'd from 5.0-R to HEAD and enabled ACPI to see if anything had changed in the past 6 months. Indeed, things have, and a few workarounds I had implemented before were no longer needed. However, I still got a host of errors from ACPI upon boot, and some hacks to

Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23

2003-06-05 Thread Matthew Emmerton
Matthew Emmerton wrote: I cvsup'd from 5.0-R to HEAD and enabled ACPI to see if anything had changed in the past 6 months. Indeed, things have, and a few workarounds I had implemented before were no longer needed. However, I still got a host of errors from ACPI upon boot, and some

Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23

2003-06-05 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 10:45:21AM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote: This is The Way Things Work. Logial device attachments are no longer compiled into the kernel in 5.x by default (see the entry in GENERIC about this), so you need to define those attachments in the device.hints file.

Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23

2003-06-05 Thread Matthew Emmerton
- Original Message - From: Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:21 AM Subject: Re: ACPI problems with HEAD and IBM ThinkPad T23 From: Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003

Re: ACPI problems: ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failedAE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT

2003-02-14 Thread Scott Long
Martin Blapp wrote: This IBM X-Series 305 show these ACPI problems. And rebooting the box with ACPI enabled hangs it (deadlock). Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: acpi0: on motherboard Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE31 Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01

Re: ACPI problems on -current

2001-11-20 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wesley Morgan writes: : Anyone have any ideas what the problem may be? The error messages I see : from the wavelan card seem to indicate an interrupt problem, but it gets : the same irq w/o the module and works fine. With all due respect, this report is too vague to

Re: ACPI problems on -current

2001-11-20 Thread Wesley Morgan
I placed the verbose boot dmesg's at www.chemikals.org/acpi and www.chemikals.org/no-acpi Thanks in advance for any help rendered! On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wesley Morgan writes: : Anyone have any ideas what the problem may be? The error

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Mike Smith wrote: This is the general form of a different problem. The hints DO NOT supply PNP identifiers. Got it yet? You are adding nothing useful in terms of forward progress on solving his problem by commenting on my postings instead of addressing his issues, which I have at least

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-07 Thread Mike Smith
Since you posted this message to -current, I just assumed you had upgraded to the latest code, and thus were using ACPI (this is the same thing that ended up confusing Mike Smith, who also made the mistake in correcting me to say that ACPI was being loaded twice on your system). Actually, I

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-06 Thread Pete Carah
Terry Lambert wrote: unknown: PNP0400 can't assign resources unknown: PNP0400 at port 0x378-0x37f on isa0 unknown: PNP0501 can't assign resources unknown: PNP0501 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff on isa0 unknown: PNP0501 can't assign resources unknown: PNP0501 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff on isa0

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-06 Thread Terry Lambert
Pete Carah wrote: Known problem... see the -current archives. It *is* a known problem. You are attaching twice: once because of ACPI, and again because of the hints. You need to comment the entries out of your hints file to make them not get attached twice. It's just not this one,

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-05 Thread Terry Lambert
Mike Smith wrote: unknown: PNP0501 can't assign resources unknown: PNP0501 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff on isa0 unknown: PNP0501 can't assign resources unknown: PNP0501 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff on isa0 Serial ports... [ ... ] You're smoking crack, again. Hints don't supply PnP IDs. Still a

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-04 Thread Terry Lambert
Pete Carah wrote: I have a panic that I haven't seen in the notes so far; if I allow load of the acpi module, it gets a can't allocate memory very early in the boot process. Hopefully the following is complete - KDE2 cut-and-paste didn't work as I expected for a big region. [ ... ]

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-04 Thread Mike Smith
unknown: PNP0400 can't assign resources unknown: PNP0400 at port 0x378-0x37f on isa0 unknown: PNP0501 can't assign resources unknown: PNP0501 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff on isa0 unknown: PNP0501 can't assign resources unknown: PNP0501 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff on isa0 unknown: PNP0f13 can't

Re: ACPI problems

2001-09-02 Thread Pete Carah
I have a panic that I haven't seen in the notes so far; if I allow load of the acpi module, it gets a can't allocate memory very early in the boot process. Hopefully the following is complete - KDE2 cut-and-paste didn't work as I expected for a big region. Motherboard is ASUS A7V with 1.2G