On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 03:46:42AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
>FWIW: If FreeBSD wanted to use this approach, the safest way to do
>it would b to split the user and kernel address space mappings; in
>general, this will only mean modifying uiomove/copy{in|out}[str],
>and dealing with the address map
Robert Watson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, David Rhodus wrote:
> > what are some of the changes that Apple made to have everything
> > dynamically linked in darwin ? Has anyone done timed runs lately on
> > dynamically vers. static linking on darwin ? Or did they find just
> > cleaning up the dlop
David Rhodus wrote:
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> >FWIW, even though I support the idea of dynamically linking
> >everything, the flipping of the switch there followed this
> >same pattern.
First, a disclaimer: this is me speaking for me; I do not speak
for Apple.
> Terry, what are some of the chang
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 07:59, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:24:23AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> [Darwin pre-binding]
> >presumably applies to other processor architectures. The one thing that
> >turns me off to this scheme is that I'd like it if we could find a way to
> >repres
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:24:23AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
[Darwin pre-binding]
>presumably applies to other processor architectures. The one thing that
>turns me off to this scheme is that I'd like it if we could find a way to
>represent this using solely existing BSD/UNIX kernel primitives (
RW> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:24:23 -0500 (EST)
RW> From: Robert Watson
[ CC list trimmed ]
RW> The one thing that turns me off to this scheme is that I'd
RW> like it if we could find a way to represent this using solely
RW> existing BSD/UNIX kernel primitives (mmap, et al) and
RW> userspace, ra
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, David Rhodus wrote:
> >FWIW, even though I support the idea of dynamically linking
> >everything, the flipping of the switch there followed this
> >same pattern.
>
> Terry, what are some of the changes that Apple made to have everything
> dynamically linked in darwin ? Has an
