Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> it does _exactly_ the same thing as patch i sent. the idea is
> to set "n->m_len" to zero. in this particular part of the code
> "n" is not modified. only "n->m_next". so i do not see any
> difference except your patch is 4 lines :)
Yours is less efficient.
-- Terry
Hello Jeffrey,
> Please try out this patch instead.
>
> Index: uipc_mbuf.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.90
> diff -u -6 -r1.90 uipc_mbuf.c
> --- uipc_mbuf.c 5 Feb 2002 02:00
