Re: Build Options Survey run
Can you put the MK_FOO column at the end so it doesn't push everything else off the Right hand side of the screen? On 11/4/15 12:37 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Hi, phk had asked me to run a build options survey again. It took about two weeks to go through all of them. The results are here: https://people.freebsd.org/~bz/build_option_survey_20151017/ There are plans to run it more often again and improve it a bit. No promises on the actual timeline but it’ll happen. Meanwhile you can go and look at things and improve them ;-) Cheers, Bjoern ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Build Options Survey run
In message , Warner Losh writes: >> phk had asked me to run a build options survey again. It took about >two weeks to go through all of them. The results are here: Many thanks! >> There are plans to run it more often again and improve it a bit. No >promises on the actual timeline but it'll happen. It's actually a good beginner task if anybody wants to do something for the project which requires just a machine and some shell programming. My old script can be improved in a lot of ways, the most productive would probably be to make it incremental rather than one big batch job. (Something like: Test any options for which there are no results, otherwise retest the option with the oldest result.) >While not all combinations tested were valid combinations, many that >failed are. Some of them look to be relatively easy to fix, while others >are much harder. If one _really_ wanted to burn CPU cycles, my testing years back revealed many combinations where options are incompatible. (NB: Today we have almost four times as many options as then and we're into N! territory here...) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Build Options Survey run
> On Nov 3, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > Hi, > > phk had asked me to run a build options survey again. It took about two > weeks to go through all of them. The results are here: > > https://people.freebsd.org/~bz/build_option_survey_20151017/ > > There are plans to run it more often again and improve it a bit. No promises > on the actual timeline but it’ll happen. > > Meanwhile you can go and look at things and improve them ;-) While not all combinations tested were valid combinations, many that failed are. Some of them look to be relatively easy to fix, while others are much harder. Warner signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
