Re: buildworld problems with today's sources

2002-07-01 Thread Andrew Gallatin
The same thing happened to me when buildworlding on a ~june 20th current box. I removed CPUTYPE from /etc/make.conf, and I fsck'ed the disk in question (after a crash resulting from the condvar problem discussed here). And I removed -j4 from my make flags. One of these things (sorry that I

Re: buildworld problems with today's sources

2002-07-01 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:47:26AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: The same thing happened to me when buildworlding on a ~june 20th current box. Ruslan explained me the source of the problem... cvs does not prune empty directories unless you specify a revision or a date. In my case i wanted

Re: buildworld problems with today's sources

2002-07-01 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Luigi Rizzo writes: On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:47:26AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: The same thing happened to me when buildworlding on a ~june 20th current box. Ruslan explained me the source of the problem... cvs does not prune empty directories unless you specify a

Re: buildworld problems with today's sources

2002-07-01 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:58:04AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: ... That's actually rather scary. It implies that a freshly checked out tree checked out with plain 'cvs co src' is no longer buildable. c'mon... it is not that terrible, just a matter of adding a -P flag luigi To

Re: buildworld problems with today's sources

2002-07-01 Thread Peter Schultz
On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 09:02, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:58:04AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: ... That's actually rather scary. It implies that a freshly checked out tree checked out with plain 'cvs co src' is no longer buildable. c'mon... it is not that terrible,

Re: buildworld problems, undefined reference to '__ntohl' and'__htonl'

2002-03-06 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 1:15 PM -0800 3/6/02, Matthew Dillon wrote: This has been broken for several days now, maybe longer. It would be nice if whoever broke it would fix it. Is this in a 'make buildworld' step? I just did one buildworld on i386, and it completed fine (src is cvsup'ed as of about noon).

Re: buildworld problems, undefined reference to '__ntohl' and'__htonl'

2002-03-06 Thread Matthew Dillon
I think it may just be my-bad. The kernel source got out of sync with the main tree. I just cvs updated the whole smelly pot and buildworld works just fine. Sorry for the false alarm! -Matt : :At 1:15 PM -0800 3/6/02, Matthew

Re: Buildworld problems

2001-09-17 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:08:01PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:33:09PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Please try the attached patch. I'm going to attempt to unbreak the upgrade path from 4.1-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT sometimes in the near future. Please try to

Re: Buildworld problems

2001-09-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:59:42PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Nope, you please try to restructure it along the lines of src/usr.bin/xinstall/Makefile rev 1.16. I'll consider it. Also, won't it be better to use the libc version of basename.c? Maybe, but I do not want more cross-tree source

Re: Buildworld problems

2001-09-17 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 09:07:46AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:59:42PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Nope, you please try to restructure it along the lines of src/usr.bin/xinstall/Makefile rev 1.16. I'll consider it. Also, won't it be better to use the libc

Re: Buildworld problems

2001-09-14 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Please try the attached patch. I'm going to attempt to unbreak the upgrade path from 4.1-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT sometimes in the near future. On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:15:00AM -0500, Wm Brian McCane wrote: I am having problems doing a buildworld. When I run it, I get the following error:

Re: Buildworld problems

2001-09-14 Thread Wm Brian McCane
Actually, I was already at 5.0-CURRENT. FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (CHINA) #7: Thu May 10 05:25:14 CDT 2001 - brian On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Please try the attached patch. I'm going to attempt to unbreak the upgrade path from 4.1-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT sometimes in the near

Re: Buildworld problems

2001-09-14 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
It's irrelevant. Your 5.0-CURRENT wasn't actually current. On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:22:54AM -0500, Wm Brian McCane wrote: Actually, I was already at 5.0-CURRENT. FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (CHINA) #7: Thu May 10 05:25:14 CDT 2001 - brian On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:

Re: Buildworld problems

2001-09-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:33:09PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Please try the attached patch. I'm going to attempt to unbreak the upgrade path from 4.1-RELEASE to 5.0-CURRENT sometimes in the near future. Please try to restructure it along the lines of

Re: buildworld Problems at NTP

2001-01-05 Thread John Indra
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:37:43AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: I'd really like to get this working so I can play with some kernel mods I made last week. Any ideas? I've just finished building world and kernel with recent -CURRENT. Didn't encounter any problem though. % uname -a FreeBSD

Re: buildworld Problems at NTP

2001-01-05 Thread David Malone
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:37:43AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: What is happening is that the system is killing off the make process because it starts to swell up so much it consumes all swap. Here is the dmesg, Were any bits of the compiler killed off? A new test snapshot of gcc was

Re: buildworld Problems at NTP

2001-01-05 Thread Mark Murray
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:37:43AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: What is happening is that the system is killing off the make process because it starts to swell up so much it consumes all swap. Here is the dmesg, Were any bits of the compiler killed off? A new test snapshot of gcc was

Re: buildworld Problems at NTP

2001-01-05 Thread Dima Dorfman
Any more ideas what to try here? I'm sure you already thought of this, but have you made sure that you aren't running any memory-hogging applications? I just compiled all the ntp programs on my laptop which is a Pentium 75 with 24MB of memory and 64MB of swap (I didn't do an entire buildworld;

Re: buildworld Problems at NTP

2001-01-05 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:54:20PM -0800, Dima Dorfman wrote: Any more ideas what to try here? I'm sure you already thought of this, but have you made sure that you aren't running any memory-hogging applications? I just compiled all the ntp programs on my laptop which is a Pentium 75 with

Re: buildworld Problems at NTP

2001-01-05 Thread Mark Murray
There was a make(1) problem a couple of weeks back. Resup, make-and-install make(1), and you should be OK. Dunno why, but ntp(d) tickled the bug. To be safe, I nuked the /usr/src/usr.bin/make tree and re-cvsup'ed so I'd checkout new-car-smell-fresh copies. I killed the /usr/obj tree

Re: BUILDWORLD Problems

2000-02-25 Thread Dan Langille
On 25 Feb 00, at 22:03, O. Hartmann wrote: One of our two servers will not perform "buildworld"! Well, kernel stuff should be on the newest track, I cvsup-dated them both today. After a short while making dependencies it stops with the following error: [snip] I deleted /usr/src/crypto

Re: BUILDWORLD Problems

2000-02-25 Thread Jeffrey J. Mountin
At 10:07 AM 2/26/00 +1300, Dan Langille wrote: On 25 Feb 00, at 22:03, O. Hartmann wrote: One of our two servers will not perform "buildworld"! Well, kernel stuff should be on the newest track, I cvsup-dated them both today. After a short while making dependencies it stops with the