Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-04-05 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:28:38PM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote: Well I can't see that since it's not an array and the values come from iterating through Cisco's API and a direct query for the transmit key. Look at ancontrol for the ugly secret details! I'm pretty sure I've also managed to

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-04-05 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Brooks Davis writes: | On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:28:38PM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote: | Well I can't see that since it's not an array and the values come | from iterating through Cisco's API and a direct query for the | transmit key. Look at ancontrol for the ugly secret details! | | I'm

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-04-05 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Doug Ambrisko wrote: Brooks Davis writes: | On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:28:38PM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote: | Well I can't see that since it's not an array and the values come | from iterating through Cisco's API and a direct query for the | transmit key. Look

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-04-02 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Bruce A. Mah writes: | 1. Seems like I needed to ifconfig the interface up before my other | commands would take effect. I don't recall needing to do any such | thing with the old driver before I could do ancontrol. Is this a | change in behavior or did I miss something? I fixed this and

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-04-02 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Doug Ambrisko wrote: Bruce A. Mah writes: | 1. Seems like I needed to ifconfig the interface up before my other | commands would take effect. I don't recall needing to do any such | thing with the old driver before I could do ancontrol. Is this a | change in

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-31 Thread Duncan Barclay
Hi Brooks, Can I suggest you add a DS22 for DS 22Mb/s which is going through final approvals at the IEEE. I'll wait for these patches to settle down and merge the functionality into the raylink driver. Are you planning on making a unified interface for things like the signal strenght cache?

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-31 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 10:16:44AM +0100, Duncan Barclay wrote: Can I suggest you add a DS22 for DS 22Mb/s which is going through final approvals at the IEEE. I've added it and updated the diff for -current. I'll mess with the -stable diff Thursday when I get back from my short vacation.

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-31 Thread Bruce A. Mah
I stupidly wrote: it is not immediately obvious to me how to set ad-hoc mode using ifconfig(8)). Please disregard...I see it now. Must be my allergy meds, yeah, that's it... :-) Bruce. PGP signature

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Cool. Does this mean that any of the foocontrol programs can go away? I've long wished that we could have some of the wireless control stuff go directly into ifconfig rather than having to run an external program before bringing up the interface. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jordan Hubbard writes: : Cool. Does this mean that any of the foocontrol programs can go away? : I've long wished that we could have some of the wireless control stuff : go directly into ifconfig rather than having to run an external : program before bringing up the

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jordan Hubbard writes: Cool. Does this mean that any of the foocontrol programs can go away? As far as I can see, anything short of firmware updates can be done by ifconfig and therefore, presumably, foocontrol can die for 802.11-valued foo. -- Poul-Henning Kamp

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:14:13PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote: Cool. Does this mean that any of the foocontrol programs can go away? I've long wished that we could have some of the wireless control stuff go directly into ifconfig rather than having to run an external program before bringing

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread David Wolfskill
From: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:07:08 +0200 Any comments/reviews before we commit the patch to PR25577 ? OK; I've built today's -CURRENT (this time, after applying Brooks' patchset; I had built -CURRENT earlier today). Here's a (slightly sanitized) ifconfig

Re: Call for review... PR 25577

2001-03-30 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 03:51:27PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: One concern, and this may well affect other NIC flavors, is the list of media types is a little annoying to parse. Hmmm... speaking Perl, I suppose it could be characterized as /^\s+supported media:(\s[\S+(\sadhoc)?)+$/