Re: Enabling RACCT/RCTL in GENERIC.
On 0429T1303, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: Hi. With the patch I've just committed, the cost of compiling with RACCT and RCTL is just a subroutine call and an unlocked variable check, in a few places. I'd like to add options RACCT, options RCTL, and options RACCT_DISABLED, to GENERIC on amd64, and MFC it before 10.2. What do you think? Thanks! https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2407 ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Enabling RACCT/RCTL in GENERIC.
It's great,please do it. Jov blog: http:amutu.com/blog http://amutu.com/blog 2015-04-29 19:03 GMT+08:00 Edward Tomasz Napierała tr...@freebsd.org: Hi. With the patch I've just committed, the cost of compiling with RACCT and RCTL is just a subroutine call and an unlocked variable check, in a few places. I'd like to add options RACCT, options RCTL, and options RACCT_DISABLED, to GENERIC on amd64, and MFC it before 10.2. What do you think? Thanks! ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Enabling RACCT/RCTL in GENERIC.
Hi! Does it mean I will manage to use rctl to set limits without recompiling GENERIC? If so, then it's extremely nice news! -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Enabling-RACCT-RCTL-in-GENERIC-tp6008374p6008378.html Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Enabling RACCT/RCTL in GENERIC.
On 0429T0441, timp wrote: Hi! Does it mean I will manage to use rctl to set limits without recompiling GENERIC? If so, then it's extremely nice news! Yes. You will still need to enable it using a tunable, though, as explained by rctl(8) error message: rctl: RACCT/RCTL present, but disabled; enable using kern.racct.enable=1 tunable ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Enabling RACCT/RCTL in GENERIC.
On 2015-04-29 07:03, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: Hi. With the patch I've just committed, the cost of compiling with RACCT and RCTL is just a subroutine call and an unlocked variable check, in a few places. I'd like to add options RACCT, options RCTL, and options RACCT_DISABLED, to GENERIC on amd64, and MFC it before 10.2. What do you think? Thanks! ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org +1 -- Allan Jude signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Enabling RACCT/RCTL in GENERIC.
On 4/29/2015 6:03 AM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: Hi. With the patch I've just committed, the cost of compiling with RACCT and RCTL is just a subroutine call and an unlocked variable check, in a few places. I'd like to add options RACCT, options RCTL, and options RACCT_DISABLED, to GENERIC on amd64, and MFC it before 10.2. What do you think? Thanks! Please. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
