Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-03 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2012-Nov-02 11:21:10 -0500, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:21:19AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: It's a shame though that, with LLVM as the default compiler, further development of FreeBSD/ia64 and FreeBSD/sparc64 will probably suffer and then stop

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread David Chisnall
On 2 Nov 2012, at 08:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Very many years ago , when 2010 was a very distant future , I do not remember the name of the writer , who wrote approximately : In 2010 , there will be Fortran , but a Fortran which may be different . I remember a talk in the mid '90s

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:08:18 +1100 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey g...@freebsd.org To: Erich Dollansky erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com Subject: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day) On Friday, 2 November 2012 at 12:21:03 +0700, Erich Dollansky

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From thera...@theravensnest.org Fri Nov 2 10:54:08 2012 On 2 Nov 2012, at 10:21, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: further development of FreeBSD/ia64 and FreeBSD/sparc64 will probably suffer and then stop altogether There is a SPARC64 back end for

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 11/02/2012 05:21 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:08:18 +1100 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey g...@freebsd.org To: Erich Dollansky erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com Subject: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day) On Friday, 2

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 08:25:58AM +, David Chisnall wrote: On 2 Nov 2012, at 08:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Very many years ago , when 2010 was a very distant future , I do not remember the name of the writer , who wrote approximately : In 2010 , there will be Fortran , but a

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:27:44AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: caNyO usti llputw hitespa cewhere ever you like in for TraN? Sigh. You can get copies of the final committee drafts of the Fortran 95, 2003, and 2008 standards. There you will learn that Fortran since Fortran 90

Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

2012-11-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:21:19AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:08:18 +1100 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey g...@freebsd.org To: Erich Dollansky erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com Subject: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day) On