FYI: differences in FreeBSD's code vs.:
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.den0024a/BABJDBHI.html
and its "Example 11.5. Cleaning by Virtual Address". . .
(I do not claim to know that the differences
point to any error. But I note them in case
they prompt something. A c
On 2017-May-2, at 2:59 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> The code around handle_el1h_sync+0x70 :
>
> 00607804 sub sp, sp, #0x80
> 00607808 sub sp, sp, #0x120
> 0060780c stp x29, x30, [sp,#272]
> 00607810 stpx28, x29, [sp,#256]
> 00607814 stp
On 2017-May-2, at 2:30 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-May-2, at 2:22 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> It turns out that the bt's from the example panics are
>> repeatable for the pc and lr sequence involved (but not
>> the specific sp's and fp's involved). I report this in
>> case it suggests a
On 2017-May-2, at 2:22 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> It turns out that the bt's from the example panics are
> repeatable for the pc and lr sequence involved (but not
> the specific sp's and fp's involved). I report this in
> case it suggests anything. I'll note that the build had
> a production style
It turns out that the bt's from the example panics are
repeatable for the pc and lr sequence involved (but not
the specific sp's and fp's involved). I report this in
case it suggests anything. I'll note that the build had
a production style kernel for a build of -r317015 .
The first type of panic
