On Wednesday 05 January 2011 14:14:39 Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
Now that I'm fairly confident that the stability issues with your.org's
VMs have been resolved, I'd like to point you to the new and improved,
semi-weekly analyzer runs at
http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/
I came
On Sun, 09.01.2011 at 01:13:54 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:30:43PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 20:36:53 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
*But*, it should grok that for
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:30:43PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 20:36:53 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
*But*, it should grok that for err(3) and exit(3). Now there are some
possible remedies:
- get
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 20.36 skrev Jilles Tjoelker:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 09:34:49 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
These are all marked as __dead2, so the compiler should know that these do
not return.
And clang did the right thing
On Thursday 06 January 2011 09:01:09 Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 20.36 skrev Jilles Tjoelker:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 09:34:49 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
These are all marked as __dead2, so the compiler should know
Den 06/01/2011 kl. 20.56 skrev Tijl Coosemans:
On Thursday 06 January 2011 09:01:09 Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 20.36 skrev Jilles Tjoelker:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
- get IPA to work with clang, or at least file a bug
- mark functions
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:59:07PM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 06/01/2011 kl. 20.56 skrev Tijl Coosemans:
On Thursday 06 January 2011 09:01:09 Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 20.36 skrev Jilles Tjoelker:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 14.56 skrev Erik Cederstrand:
Ignoring contrib code for the moment, I decided to look at usr.sbin.pw from
2011-01-05. There's one report
(http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/usr.sbin.pw/2011-01-05-amd64/report-KkilQ3.html#EndPath)
which turns out to be a false
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 14.14 skrev Ulrich Spörlein:
Hello folks,
Now that I'm fairly confident that the stability issues with your.org's
VMs have been resolved, I'd like to point you to the new and improved,
semi-weekly analyzer runs at
http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/
I
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:11:50 am Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 14.56 skrev Erik Cederstrand:
Ignoring contrib code for the moment, I decided to look at usr.sbin.pw
from 2011-01-05. There's one report
On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 09:34:49 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:11:50 am Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 14.56 skrev Erik Cederstrand:
Ignoring contrib code for the moment, I decided to look at usr.sbin.pw
from 2011-01-05. There's one report
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Sp??rlein wrote:
On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 09:34:49 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:11:50 am Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 14.56 skrev Erik Cederstrand:
Ignoring contrib code for the moment, I
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 09:34:49 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
These are all marked as __dead2, so the compiler should know that these do
not return.
And clang did the right thing here in the past. Beware that it does no
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 17.55 skrev Ulrich Spörlein:
And clang did the right thing here in the past. Beware that it does no
inter-procedural analysis yet, so it will usually miss that usage()
calls exit unconditionally.
*But*, it should grok that for err(3) and exit(3). Now there are some
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:22:42PM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 05/01/2011 kl. 17.55 skrev Ulrich Sp?rlein:
And clang did the right thing here in the past. Beware that it does no
inter-procedural analysis yet, so it will usually miss that usage()
calls exit unconditionally.
On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 20:36:53 +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:55:45PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Wed, 05.01.2011 at 09:34:49 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
These are all marked as __dead2, so the compiler should know that these
do
not return.
And clang
16 matches
Mail list logo
