Re: Feature test for OpenSSL + RSA

2000-01-18 Thread jack
On Jan 17 Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, jack wrote: On Jan 17 Kris Kennaway wrote: + rm -f /etc/ssl/openssl_hasrsa Doh, I meant /bin/rm No, you meant ${RM} I couldn't find this defined in /usr/share/mk/* - it's only in bsd.port.mk, AFAICT. Ummm,

Re: Feature test for OpenSSL + RSA

2000-01-18 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:53:10 PST, Kris Kennaway wrote: +.if defined(WITH_RSA) ${WITH_RSA} == YES + /usr/bin/touch /etc/ssl/openssl_hasrsa Um, are you sure you want that hard path, /etc/ssl ? Shouldn't there be a ${DESTDIR} in there? What do you need this for? Ciao, Sheldon. To

Re: Feature test for OpenSSL + RSA

2000-01-18 Thread Peter Wemm
Sheldon Hearn wrote: On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:53:10 PST, Kris Kennaway wrote: +.if defined(WITH_RSA) ${WITH_RSA} == YES + /usr/bin/touch /etc/ssl/openssl_hasrsa Um, are you sure you want that hard path, /etc/ssl ? Shouldn't there be a ${DESTDIR} in there? What do you need this

Re: Feature test for OpenSSL + RSA

2000-01-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote: On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 21:53:10 PST, Kris Kennaway wrote: +.if defined(WITH_RSA) ${WITH_RSA} == YES + /usr/bin/touch /etc/ssl/openssl_hasrsa Um, are you sure you want that hard path, /etc/ssl ? Shouldn't there be a ${DESTDIR} in there? What

Re: Feature test for OpenSSL + RSA

2000-01-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Peter Wemm wrote: Yes, This should most definately have ${DESTDIR} for this sort of thing, but even then I'm not sure this is a good change.. We have got to find a better way than this. I've said this a couple of times in private, but will repeat it again for the list:

Re: Feature test for OpenSSL + RSA

2000-01-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: + rm -f /etc/ssl/openssl_hasrsa Doh, I meant /bin/rm Kris "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: Feature test for OpenSSL + RSA

2000-01-17 Thread jack
On Jan 17 Kris Kennaway wrote: + rm -f /etc/ssl/openssl_hasrsa Doh, I meant /bin/rm No, you meant ${RM} -- Jack O'NeillSystems Administrator / Systems Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] Crystal Wind

Re: Feature test for OpenSSL + RSA

2000-01-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, jack wrote: On Jan 17 Kris Kennaway wrote: + rm -f /etc/ssl/openssl_hasrsa Doh, I meant /bin/rm No, you meant ${RM} I couldn't find this defined in /usr/share/mk/* - it's only in bsd.port.mk, AFAICT. Kris "How many roads must a man walk down, before you

Re: Feature test for OpenSSL + RSA

2000-01-17 Thread Chuck Robey
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: No, you meant ${RM} I couldn't find this defined in /usr/share/mk/* - it's only in bsd.port.mk, AFAICT. I'm note sure mine's up to date, where the definition is on line 876 of bsd.port.mk ... but I'm *sure* it's in there, it has been for ages!

Re: Feature test for OpenSSL + RSA

2000-01-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Chuck Robey wrote: No, you meant ${RM} I couldn't find this defined in /usr/share/mk/* - it's only in bsd.port.mk, AFAICT. I'm note sure mine's up to date, where the definition is on line 876 of bsd.port.mk ... but I'm *sure* it's in there, it has been for

Re: Feature test for OpenSSL + RSA

2000-01-17 Thread Chuck Robey
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Chuck Robey wrote: No, you meant ${RM} I couldn't find this defined in /usr/share/mk/* - it's only in bsd.port.mk, AFAICT. I'm note sure mine's up to date, where the definition is on line 876 of bsd.port.mk