On Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:46:16 -0500
James FitzGibbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both of the patches below fix the problem mentioned in PR bin/25110. The
> first one fixes it inside of kern_fork.c and would appear to apply the
> corrective behaviour regardless of whether the process uses libc_r or not.
The first patch that I sent to you makes the SS_DISABLE flag setting
be inherited to the child process (especially when the parent have
cleared the flag), as I had mentioned in the mail to -current:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=332928+0+archive/2001/freebsd-current/20010304.freebsd-current
I'm not sure that the SS_DISABLE flag setting should be inherited to
the child process, but at least I can say the behavior of 5-CURRENT
(and 4-STABLE) is different from that of Solaris 7, NetBSD 1.5 and
FreeBSD 3.5-STABLE.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
