Re: HEADS UP: GNU grep 2.4d
hi, there! On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Jeremy Lea wrote: It was a local FreeBSD feature; now it is part of the official GNU grep. Any chance of -R coming back too? it is already there (-r) /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: HEADS UP: GNU grep 2.4d
Thus spake Max Khon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): It was a local FreeBSD feature; now it is part of the official GNU grep. Any chance of -R coming back too? it is already there (-r) Hmm. Somehow I dislike name-changes of params. :-( Alex -- I doubt, therefore I might be. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: HEADS UP: GNU grep 2.4d
hi, there! On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Alexander Langer wrote: It was a local FreeBSD feature; now it is part of the official GNU grep. Any chance of -R coming back too? it is already there (-r) Hmm. Somehow I dislike name-changes of params. :-( GREP guys decided to use -r (which was absent in grep 2.0). -a changed its behavior to opposite also. /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: HEADS UP: GNU grep 2.4d
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 08:28:30PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Yes, that's why all this fuss have taken place ;=) WOOHOO! I agree with Alex Langer, though. -R - -r gets on my nerves. But I suppose it is consistent with `rm`, just not `cp`.. hmm, consistency. -- Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G+ e- h! r--+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: HEADS UP: GNU grep 2.4d
On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 08:24:41AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 08:28:30PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Yes, that's why all this fuss have taken place ;=) WOOHOO! I agree with Alex Langer, though. -R - -r gets on my nerves. But I suppose it is consistent with `rm`, just not `cp`.. hmm, consistency. In fact, it is consistent with GNU grep ;=) Old -a and -R were FreeBSD extensions that have gone now. -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the [EMAIL PROTECTED]United Commercial Bank, [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer, +380.652.247.647Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: HEADS UP: GNU grep 2.4d
Thus spake Ruslan Ermilov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I agree with Alex Langer, though. -R - -r gets on my nerves. But I suppose it is consistent with `rm`, just not `cp`.. hmm, consistency. In fact, it is consistent with GNU grep ;=) Old -a and -R were FreeBSD extensions that have gone now. That's why we all don't like the GNU folks *duck* ;-) Alex -- I doubt, therefore I might be. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: HEADS UP: GNU grep 2.4d
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 03:54:00PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Under a big pressure from the FreeBSD community, GNU grep maintainers released grep-2.4d, which has a new option -I, a short equivalent to --binary-files='without-match'. Is this also equivalent to the old grep's -a option? I mean OLD grep, from like 6 months ago? grep -a normally ignored binary files completely, back then. -- Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] GCS/E/S @d- s+:++:- a---+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G+ e- h! r--+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: HEADS UP: GNU grep 2.4d
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 01:02:29PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 03:54:00PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Under a big pressure from the FreeBSD community, GNU grep maintainers released grep-2.4d, which has a new option -I, a short equivalent to --binary-files='without-match'. Is this also equivalent to the old grep's -a option? I mean OLD grep, from like 6 months ago? Yes, that's why all this fuss have taken place ;=) grep -a normally ignored binary files completely, back then. It was a local FreeBSD feature; now it is part of the official GNU grep. -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the [EMAIL PROTECTED]United Commercial Bank, [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer, +380.652.247.647Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
