-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.09.2011 21:32, Hartmann, O. wrote:
floating like a dead man in the water. I suspect the
conversters/libiconv broke something, since it claims it has
installed libiconv.so.3, but there is never such a shared object
installed!
Here's what I
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating system ...
FreeBSD XP anyone?
Are you sure
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating system ...
FreeBSD XP anyone?
Are you sure there's a sufficient window of opportunity?
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating
On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
10
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Now I understand why some OS
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann
On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com
On 09/28/11 20:56, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com
On 09/28/11 12:16, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:56, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
Hartmann, O.ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 21:16, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:56, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 21:30, Matt wrote:
On 09/28/11 12:16, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:56, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
Hartmann, O.ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess they
got broken. Last I saw was a successful installation
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess
On 09/28/2011 13:45, Beech Rintoul wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
Since this build binutils
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:47:50 Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 13:45, Beech Rintoul wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG
compiling port
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Beech Rintoul be...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:53:23 Beech Rintoul wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:47:50 Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 13:45, Beech Rintoul wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com writes:
So if I change /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh to something like vers 9.9 I'm
not
going to shoot myself in the foot if I try and update? I would really like to
avoid downgrading this box.I've altready been bitten once today and had to
build packages
On 09/28/11 22:18, Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess they
got broken. Last I
On 09/28/11 15:41, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 22:18, Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
Since this build binutils and even gettext and
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Matt wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:41, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 22:18, Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
Since
It just means that folks didn't plan ahead and didn't think up
proper contingency plans.
First off, apologies to Garrett, I'm not picking on you directly, but I
kinda knew this would come up.
The undeniable fact is that configure scripts in general have chosen to
do things a certain way.
On 27/09/2011, at 13:33, Ade Lovett wrote:
That is to say, until 9.0-R happens, and for some considerable period
afterwards, ya'll can pretty much expect ports/ to be non-functional on
HEAD. PRs mentioning this will be gleefully closed referencing this
message.
I imagine you can work around
Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
The issue stems from configure scripts (to
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, h h wrote:
Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
The issue
On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote:
Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovetta...@freebsd.org wrote:
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
The issue stems
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote:
Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovetta...@freebsd.org wrote:
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/
At 11:18 27/09/2011, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin 10 'X' for
their tenth version of their operating system ...
At least there will be a long rest after
the move to 10 is complete.. until FreeBSD 100.
Or move to hexadecimal
$ export
Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
The undeniable fact is that configure scripts in general have
chosen to do things a certain way. Unfortunately for us (us
being FreeBSD), we have now broken these conceptions by moving
to a dual-digit major release.
I don't suppose
REVISION=A.1
i.e.
On 09/27/11 16:46, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Ade Lovetta...@freebsd.org wrote:
The undeniable fact is that configure scripts in general have
chosen to do things a certain way. Unfortunately for us (us
being FreeBSD), we have now broken these conceptions by moving
to a dual-digit major
On 27 September 2011 10:18, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote:
Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovetta...@freebsd.org wrote:
With the
Eduardo Morras nec...@retena.com writes:
At 11:18 27/09/2011, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin 10 'X' for
their tenth version of their operating system ...
At least there will be a long rest after
the move to 10 is complete.. until
krad writes:
we can leave that to our grand children to figure out though 8)
Wasn't that what people said about two-digit years?
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On 27 September 2011 20:22, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
krad writes:
we can leave that to our grand children to figure out though 8)
Wasn't that what people said about two-digit years?
Our children will be dealing with Y2038. :-)
Adrian
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin 10 'X' for their
tenth version of their operating system ...
FreeBSD XP anyone?
___
freebsd-po...@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:22:54AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
krad writes:
we can leave that to our grand children to figure out though 8)
Wasn't that what people said about two-digit years?
Not quite. There they mostly said No way that this program will still
be in use when
On 27 September 2011 13:57, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 27 September 2011 20:22, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
krad writes:
we can leave that to our grand children to figure out though 8)
Wasn't that what people said about two-digit years?
Our children
Adrian Chadd writes:
we can leave that to our grand children to figure out though 8)
Wasn't that what people said about two-digit years?
Our children will be dealing with Y2038. :-)
Statistically, some of us will.
Robert
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:36:17AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Robert Huff, and lo! it spake thus:
Adrian Chadd writes:
Our children will be dealing with Y2038. :-)
Statistically, some of us will.
Actually, I had to deal with it just last week...
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) |
On 09/27/11 16:27, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:36:17AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Robert Huff, and lo! it spake thus:
Adrian Chadd writes:
Our children will be dealing with Y2038. :-)
Statistically, some of us will.
Actually, I had to deal with it just last week...
On 27 September 2011 10:18, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote:
Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovetta...@freebsd.org wrote:
With the advent
On Sep 27, 2011 10:04 AM, Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 27 September 2011 10:18, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote:
Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 26,
On (26/09/2011 23:03), Ade Lovett wrote:
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose something completely
at random) assuming that FreeBSD would
On Sep 27, 2011, at 8:50 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (26/09/2011 23:03), Ade Lovett wrote:
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose something
Hi--
On Sep 27, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
It's more exciting than that. FreeBSD = 10 is already seized by Apple :)
http://www.google.com/codesearch#search/q=__FreeBSD__%5CW%2B10type=cs
MacOS X doesn't define __FreeBSD__ either in CPP macros or the system headers:
% touch foo.h;
On 09/27/11 02:37, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 27/09/2011, at 13:33, Ade Lovett wrote:
That is to say, until 9.0-R happens, and for some considerable period
afterwards, ya'll can pretty much expect ports/ to be non-functional on
HEAD. PRs mentioning this will be gleefully closed referencing
Michael Butler i...@protected-networks.net writes:
On 09/27/11 02:37, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 27/09/2011, at 13:33, Ade Lovett wrote:
That is to say, until 9.0-R happens, and for some considerable period
afterwards, ya'll can pretty much expect ports/ to be non-functional on
HEAD. PRs
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose something completely
at random)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
The issue stems
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not the FreeBSD dev's fault. Unfortunately the autotools folks
were microoptimizing and didn't consider that the future would come
sooner than it actually did.
Garrett,
First, I'm not complaining or criticizing
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not the FreeBSD dev's fault. Unfortunately the autotools folks
were microoptimizing and didn't consider that the future would come
sooner
53 matches
Mail list logo