On 24 June 2010 11:06, Mohammed Farrag wrote:
> @ Matt
> Thanx for ur reply Matt.
> /
> FreeBSD is already a very modular system and the traditional way (a
> traditional way) to build for embedded systems is to follow the
> NanoBSD build method (
hi sorry for being late in reply but I had some problems in the last week. I
hope u still remeber what I was talking about :)
@chargen
Thanx for ur reply.
Embedded computer systems permeate all aspects of our daily lives.
Alarm clocks, coffee makers, digital watches, cell phones, and automobiles
ar
hi sorry for being late in reply but I had some problems in the last week. I
hope u still remeber what I was talking about :)
@chargen
Thanx for ur reply.
Embedded computer systems permeate all aspects of our daily lives.
Alarm clocks, coffee makers, digital watches, cell phones, and automobiles
ar
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:19:22 +0930
Matt Thyer wrote:
> However my Soekris net4801 board still takes about 2.5 minutes to boot
> and I think time could be saved by parallel probing of hardware where
> possible.
>
> Much work has been done on fast boot times in the Linux world
> including an impre
On 12 June 2010 12:02, Chargen wrote:
> Sir, first of all: I'm no expert in this field but I've seen your document
> and I'm still wondering why you should impose such a design.
>
> I suppose it's well thought of but still I'm a bit opposed to binary
> configuration files because I think has to be
Sir, first of all: I'm no expert in this field but I've seen your document
and I'm still wondering why you should impose such a design.
I suppose it's well thought of but still I'm a bit opposed to binary
configuration files because I think has to be some kind of dependency on how
to generate thes
