On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Julian Elischer writes:
> : All looks good.. obviously the logic of what was going on was easy
> : enough to pick up :-)
> :
> : the only bit I didn't see so easily was:
> : ...
> : @@ -2860,7 +2861,7 @@
> : /*
> :
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Julian Elischer writes:
: All looks good.. obviously the logic of what was going on was easy
: enough to pick up :-)
:
: the only bit I didn't see so easily was:
:
: static int
: -fdformat(dev, finfo, p)
: +fdformat(dev, finfo, td)
: dev_t dev;
: s
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> # please excuse this message in English to the traditionally Japanese list.
> # Julians changes broke pc98 builds with his KSE commits.
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Warner Losh writes:
> : Actaully, the issues are that machdep and friends weren't updated.
>
> Please
"P. U. (Uli) Kruppa" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering how many people have tried running -current with the
> > KSE-2 changes in it. I've had only one minor bug report so far.
> > (which is either good or bad depending on wheterh it means
> > "it all work
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I'm wondering how many people have tried running -current with the
> KSE-2 changes in it. I've had only one minor bug report so far.
> (which is either good or bad depending on wheterh it means
> "it all works" or "No-one is using it")
I do run -C
# please excuse this message in English to the traditionally Japanese list.
# Julians changes broke pc98 builds with his KSE commits.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Warner Losh writes:
: Actaully, the issues are that machdep and friends weren't updated.
Please review http://people.freebsd.org/~i
Okay, from -CURRENT fetched at approximately 1320 CDT today, buildworld/installworld
were successful, building the kernel was
successful, booting failed with the following [copied by hand]:
trap 12: page fault in kernel mode
cpuid = 1 lapic id = 0100
virt. addr = 0x0
code = supervisor rea
Actaully, the issues are that machdep and friends weren't updated.
I'm updating now. :-(
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Julian
Elischer writes:
: They should be (mostly) not specific to i386 unless they have
: endian-ness issues (which I think some might)
: They are in files, not file.i386.
netgraph isn't the issue. machdep hasn't been changed, along with
others. I'm working on a
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Julian
>Elischer writes:
> : Peter reminded me that we haven't changed the pc98 files for
> : netgraph. In nearly all cases the changes will be identical to those
> : in the i386 files but we have no way of testing them..
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:18:49PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering how many people have tried running -current with the
> > KSE-2 changes in it. I've had only one minor bug report so far.
>
> IA-64 compiles and runs in the si
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Julian
Elischer writes:
: Peter reminded me that we haven't changed the pc98 files for
: netgraph. In nearly all cases the changes will be identical to those
: in the i386 files but we have no way of testing them..
Is there a reason that the netgraph files are i386
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:18:49PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> I'm wondering how many people have tried running -current with the
> KSE-2 changes in it. I've had only one minor bug report so far.
IA-64 compiles and runs in the simulator. I didn't upgrade my
i386 or alpha boxes yet. If you
13 matches
Mail list logo
