Re: Kernel panic from recent build

2016-05-03 Thread Eric van Gyzen
I intend it as a workaround to be committed, not as debugging. Eric On 05/02/2016 18:51, Ryan Stone wrote: > Do we need this debug output? It's quite clear from the acpidump output > that there is an entry for APIC ID 0 in memory domain 0 and memory > domain 1. Not sure if that's legal by the

Re: Kernel panic from recent build

2016-05-02 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, May 02, 2016 05:17:49 PM Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 05/02/2016 16:14, Bill O'Hanlon wrote: > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:55 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > >> On Monday, May 02, 2016 01:35:54 PM Bill O'Hanlon wrote: > >>> ​ > >>> IMG_20160502_130335.jpg > >>> < > >>

Re: Kernel panic from recent build

2016-05-02 Thread Ryan Stone
Do we need this debug output? It's quite clear from the acpidump output that there is an entry for APIC ID 0 in memory domain 0 and memory domain 1. Not sure if that's legal by the spec. On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 05/02/2016 16:14, Bill

Re: Kernel panic from recent build

2016-05-02 Thread Eric van Gyzen
On 05/02/2016 16:14, Bill O'Hanlon wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:55 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On Monday, May 02, 2016 01:35:54 PM Bill O'Hanlon wrote: >>> ​ >>> IMG_20160502_130335.jpg >>> < >>

Re: Kernel panic from recent build

2016-05-02 Thread Bill O'Hanlon
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:55 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, May 02, 2016 01:35:54 PM Bill O'Hanlon wrote: > > ​ > > IMG_20160502_130335.jpg > > < > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dtJxTwWXfhXVUUtn1Vvpzh3laJt7AILyCg/view?usp=drive_web > > > > ​ > > I'm getting the

Re: Kernel panic from recent build

2016-05-02 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, May 02, 2016 01:35:54 PM Bill O'Hanlon wrote: > ​ > IMG_20160502_130335.jpg > > ​ > I'm getting the following panic from a recent (May 2, 2016) build. > panic: Duplicate local APIC ID 0 > > The