Re: LOCK overheads (was Re: objtrm problem probably found)

1999-07-19 Thread Julian Elischer
A bit late, but some more data points. 90MHz Pentium, FreeBSD 2.2.7 mode 0 60.80 ns/loop nproc=1 lcks=EMPTY mode 1 91.13 ns/loop nproc=1 lcks=no mode 2 91.11 ns/loop nproc=2 lcks=no mode 3 242.59 ns/loop nproc=1 lcks=yes mode 4 242.69 ns/loop nproc=2 lcks=yes mode 5 586.27 ns/loop

Re: LOCK overheads (was Re: objtrm problem probably found)

1999-07-13 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Matthew Dillon: Wow, now that *is* expensive! The K6 must be implementing it in microcode for it to be that bad. K6-200: 244 [21:57] roberto@keltia:src/C ./locktest 0 ... empty 26.84 ns/loop 1proc 22.62 ns/loop 2proc 22.64 ns/loop empty w/locks 17.58 ns/loop 1proc

Re: LOCK overheads (was Re: objtrm problem probably found)

1999-07-13 Thread Peter Jeremy
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :mode 1 17.99 ns/loop nproc=1 lcks=no :mode 3 166.33 ns/loop nproc=1 lcks=yes ... :This is a K6-2 350. Locks are pretty expensive on them. Wow, now that *is* expensive! The K6 must be implementing it in microcode for it to be that bad. I