Re: More ATA disks with tagged queueing ?

On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 09:46:43AM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Nickolay N. Dudorov wrote: > > > The diskid (IC...) has me somewhat stumped though, I would have thougt > > > the used something like all other IBM disks. Is this a genuine IBM disk > > > or is it some kind of OEM/rebadged d

Re: More ATA disks with tagged queueing ?

S?ren Schmidt wrote: [ ... IDE tagged command queueing support ... ] > > Is there any way to test/demonstarte this ? > > Not without instrumenting the code currently Turn off write caching, and see if it damages your concurrency; if it doesn't, it supports tagging... }B^) -- Terry To Unsubscr

Re: More ATA disks with tagged queueing ?

It seems Nickolay N. Dudorov wrote: > > The diskid (IC...) has me somewhat stumped though, I would have thougt > > the used something like all other IBM disks. Is this a genuine IBM disk > > or is it some kind of OEM/rebadged device ? > > Yes, this IS genuine IBM disk. > See:

Re: More ATA disks with tagged queueing ?

On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 09:10:33AM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote: > It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > After applaying the next patch I can now see > > in dmesg output: > > > > > > ad4: 19574MB [39770/16/63] at ata2-master tagged UDMA66 > > ad6: 19623MB [39870/16/63] at ata3-ma

Re: More ATA disks with tagged queueing ?

Hi, Am Do , dem 21. Jun 2001, um 9:10 +0200 Uhr schrubte Søren Schmidt zum Thema [Re: More ATA disks with tagged queueing ?]: > Yups, else it would have failed bitterly.. > The diskid (IC...) has me somewhat stumped though, I would have thougt > the used something like all other IBM

Re: More ATA disks with tagged queueing ?

It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > After applaying the next patch I can now see > in dmesg output: > > > ad4: 19574MB [39770/16/63] at ata2-master tagged UDMA66 > ad6: 19623MB [39870/16/63] at ata3-master tagged UDMA66 > . > > This configuration (ad6 i