Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "David O'Brien" writes:
: On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 12:48:40PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
: In the US, how do I get the same thing for C++?
:
: http://web.ansi.org/public/std_info.html
:
: Search for "C++":
:
: ISO/IEC 14882:1998
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2000 03:58:57 +0200, Bernd Luevelsmeyer wrote:
The Standard itself is a book and can be bought as such in bookstores.
Can you give us details? Do I just hunt Amazon.com for "C99", or does
it have a proper title? I need this
On Thu, 11 May 2000 03:58:57 +0200, Bernd Luevelsmeyer wrote:
The Standard itself is a book and can be bought as such in bookstores.
Can you give us details? Do I just hunt Amazon.com for "C99", or does
it have a proper title? I need this one.
Thanks,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2000 03:58:57 +0200, Bernd Luevelsmeyer wrote:
The Standard itself is a book and can be bought as such in bookstores.
Can you give us details? Do I just hunt Amazon.com for "C99", or does
it have a proper title? I need this one.
What you want is
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bernd Luevelsmeyer writes:
: What you want is "ISO/IEC 9899:1999 Programming languages -- C"
In the US, how do I get the same thing for C++?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 12:48:40PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
In the US, how do I get the same thing for C++?
http://web.ansi.org/public/std_info.html
Search for "C++":
ISO/IEC 14882:1998 Programming languages - C++ $ 305
ISO/IEC 14882-1998 Information Technology - Programming Languages - C++
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "David O'Brien" writes:
: On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 12:48:40PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
: In the US, how do I get the same thing for C++?
:
: http://web.ansi.org/public/std_info.html
:
: Search for "C++":
:
: ISO/IEC 14882:1998 Programming languages - C++ $ 305
:
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bernd Luevelsmeyer writes:
: What you want is "ISO/IEC 9899:1999 Programming languages -- C"
In the US, how do I get the same thing for C++?
Warner
I don't talk C++, but I think you'll want "ISO/IEC 14882:1998
Programming languages --
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warner Losh writes:
: That's cool. I can get the electronic version for only $18. What
: format is it in?
Never mind. Found that it is in PDF. Now where did I put that credit
card...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
David Malone wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:53:27AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
From the C99 draft (n869.txt):
Is the C99 draft generally available, or where can you cough up
cash to get a copy?
The Standard itself is a book and can be bought as such in bookstores.
Draft versions
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Simon Shapiro wrote:
On 10-May-00 Doug Rabson wrote:
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
that added -Wcast-qual to the
On 10-May-00 Doug Rabson wrote:
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options.
Or we should just delete it
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2000 19:08:21 -0400 (EDT), Simon Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
So does:
bzero((void *)trash, sizeof(junk_t));
So, how do I make everyone happy?
Put a comment on that line indicating that a warning is expected.
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:53:27AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
From the C99 draft (n869.txt):
Is the C99 draft generally available, or where can you cough up
cash to get a copy?
David.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Simon Shapiro wrote:
It actually worked! Now I will go and see what this uintptr_t
actually is :-)
Its an unsigned integer type which is the same size as a pointer (i.e. its
safe to cast a pointer to uintptr_t without losing
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options.
Or we should just delete it from the options.
Ugh. I don't
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Doug Rabson wrote:
You can suppress the warning if you cast to uintptr_t first. Pretty ugly
though.
For (almost) full uglyness and correctness, you have to cast to
"volatile void *" first, then back via "void *":
#define unvolstructfoop(sfp) \
((struct foo *)(void
The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options. Or write your own,
suboptimal, bzero code.
Hi Again,
Since you were so kind to me, I will impose another
one on you (the previous answers were _all_ correct! )
Given:
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options.
Or we should just delete it from the options.
--
-- David([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options.
Or we should just delete it from the options.
Ugh. I don't actually like that, because it serves a valid
Mike Smith wrote:
Ugh. I don't actually like that, because it serves a valid purpose.
What irritates me mostly is just that there is no way of casting a
volatile object into a non-volatile type, so you can't implement any sort
of conditional volatility exclusion.
You can however use a
At 7:08 PM -0400 5/9/00, Simon Shapiro wrote:
Given:
typedef struct junk {
...
} junk_t
volatile junk_t trash;
What I want to do is zero out trash.
bzero(trash, sizeof(junk_t));
produces a warning about loss of volatility.
So, how do I make everyone happy?
Write a 'bzerov' function,
On 10-May-00 Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Mike Smith wrote:
Ugh. I don't actually like that, because it serves a valid purpose.
What irritates me mostly is just that there is no way of casting a
volatile object into a non-volatile type, so you can't implement any sort
of conditional
On 09-May-00 Mike Smith wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was
that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options.
Or we should just delete it from the options.
Ugh. I don't actually like
24 matches
Mail list logo
