Re: Panic from ipfw_alloc_rule() after r334769 -> r334832

2018-06-08 Thread David Wolfskill
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 11:40:37AM -0400, Jonathan T. Looney wrote: > ... > If anyone is hitting this bug and needs to get a working system in the > meantime, you'll need to revert the following commits which implemented (or > updated) this change: > > r334830 > r334829 > r334824 > > Jonathan I

Re: Panic from ipfw_alloc_rule() after r334769 -> r334832

2018-06-08 Thread Mateusz Guzik
weird, my grep-fu failed me hardcore i guess. Will fix shortly. On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Jonathan T. Looney wrote: > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Jonathan T. Looney > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:38 AM, David Wolfskill > wrote: > > > > > > Sorry for lack of much

Re: Panic from ipfw_alloc_rule() after r334769 -> r334832

2018-06-08 Thread Jonathan T. Looney
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Jonathan T. Looney wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:38 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: > > > > Sorry for lack of much analysis; am at BSDCan. jtl@ suggested that a > > sequence of changes involving memory allocation and ipfw counters is > > likely to be at issue.

Re: Panic from ipfw_alloc_rule() after r334769 -> r334832

2018-06-08 Thread Jonathan T. Looney
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:38 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: > > Sorry for lack of much analysis; am at BSDCan. jtl@ suggested that a > sequence of changes involving memory allocation and ipfw counters is > likely to be at issue. Just to be clear, I speculated that this seemed like it could be caused