>ok I understand now...
>I thought you were saying that the netgraph code was acting differently
>to how I belive it should act.
Nope that was the legacy bridge.
> > Exactly if there's just one interface when netgraph bridging is on. Why?
> > Why just one interface? Now that my kernel is patche
"Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" wrote:
>
[explanation]
ok I understand now...
I thought you were saying that the netgraph code was acting differently
to how I belive it should act.
>
>
>
>
> Exactly if there's just one interface when netgraph bridging is on. Why?
> Why just one interface? Now that m