John Baldwin wrote:
> Bah, we leave interrupts disabled during fast interrupt handlers, so this
> should be fine in -current since the softclock swi_sched() uses SWI_NOSWITCH
> (there is no NOSWITCH flag in a preemptive kernel, it's automatic and that is
> what bit the preemption kernel).
I think
John Baldwin wrote:
> The problem is that during a fast interrupt handler, we don't acknowledge the
> interrupt until we return from the interrupt handler, so if we preempt it may
> be a while before we get back to the interrupted process so it can finish the
> interrupt handler and ack the interr
[This is the continuation of a thread that started on -committers]
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 02:48:48PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 01:35:20AM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 03:51:07PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > Josef Karthauser
