Jacques Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have one (colorado thing). I _will not_ adopt it :-) but I'd
happily send it to a committer that wanted to support it. I haven't
used it in years, but AFAIK it still works.
I have an old Conner drive and three 40MB tapes which I will happily
On [19991016 04:00], jack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Today Julian Elischer wrote:
hey If someone did adopt it then it wouldn't be a problem..
if no-on edoes then it can remain 'unsupported'
unsupported != tucked away in the attic, out of reach of
many/most users.
Current != platform for
Today Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
On [19991016 04:00], jack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Today Julian Elischer wrote:
hey If someone did adopt it then it wouldn't be a problem..
if no-on edoes then it can remain 'unsupported'
unsupported != tucked away in the attic, out of reach of
Sorry if I ask a FAQ,
Don't be sorry, don't do it. Search the mailing list archives.
But where is ft0 support gone?
Into the bitbucket.
--
\\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith
\\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ and
Today Mike Smith wrote:
Sorry if I ask a FAQ,
Don't be sorry, don't do it. Search the mailing list archives.
It might help if HARDWARE.TXT (both -current and -stable) didn't
list floppy tapes. It refers to the driver as "stale" rather
than gone.
the driver could come back if someone who HAD such a device were to adopt
it..
On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, jack wrote:
Today Mike Smith wrote:
Sorry if I ask a FAQ,
Don't be sorry, don't do it. Search the mailing list archives.
It might help if HARDWARE.TXT (both -current and
On Fri, 15 Oct 1999 10:20:54 -0700 (PDT), Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
the driver could come back if someone who HAD such a device were to adopt
it..
Probably not. The hardware is just so transcendently evil that it's
unlikely it could be made to work reliably for more than one or
