On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 12:33:45PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
want the errno support completely removed so that we have a chance
of declaring math functions as __pure2 unconditionally. But maybe
we can't do this anyway, because math functions
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 12:33:45PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Steve Kargl wrote:
I forgot about the missing __pure2 in math.h. (It prevents gcc
doing optimizations like moving sqrt(2) out of loops.) There is
another thread on freebsd-standards about _MULTI_LIBM support.
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Steve Kargl wrote:
A long time ago I submitted PR misc/17848 which
removes CSRG libm sources. The audit trail shows
some commentary, but AFAICT nothing much has been
done based on that commentary. With the upcoming
release of of 5.0, I think we should consider the
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:19:13AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Steve Kargl wrote:
A long time ago I submitted PR misc/17848 which
removes CSRG libm sources. The audit trail shows
some commentary, but AFAICT nothing much has been
done based on that commentary. With
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Steve Kargl wrote:
I re-read the audit trail of the PR. You list two items:
gamma() should become tgamma(); and, (lack of) the use
of __pure2. I was planning to compare our msun against
NetBSD and merge any appropriate changes (if any exists).
Do you have any patches
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl wr
ites:
A long time ago I submitted PR misc/17848 which
removes CSRG libm sources. The audit trail shows
some commentary, but AFAICT nothing much has been
done based on that commentary. With the upcoming
release of of 5.0, I think we should consider
