On Thu, 09 May 2002 10:13:04 MST, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Uh, csh. Preferrably with tcsh extensions, so it won't run anywhere
> else. In a pinch, I guess you could use "bash".
>
>
Poul-Henning was too kind. You shouldn't be banned from the lists, you
should be taken out back and shot until
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:]
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 09:32:10AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> > Why?? If someone wants to use perl in building a port, let them.
> > Add a BUILD_DEPENDS.
>
> Seems like an awful amount of installation if all you ar
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Uh, csh. Preferrably with tcsh extensions, so it won't run anywhere
> else. In a pinch, I guess you could use "bash".
As far i can see, (almost?) everything is already moved from perl to
something else. Asked it, went away for a few hours and all the
Richard Arends wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
> > > Can somebody, or maybe you, make a list off the perl script in the base
> > > OS, that need to be rewritten??
> >
> > Of course! :). Done, sent to current@
>
> Perfect...
>
> What is preffered: C, Shell ???
Uh, csh. Preferrab
