Re: SMP + APM = panic -> fixed!

2000-06-07 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, > On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > > > We're having this problem for long time (from the old 4.0-CURRENT > > days), but Mr. SUMITANI discovered a bug and fixed it. > > The problem was that we got worng gdt pointer for the current cpu, > > then panic... > > The followings is a pat

Re: SMP + APM = panic -> fixed!

2000-06-06 Thread Boris Popov
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > We're having this problem for long time (from the old 4.0-CURRENT > days), but Mr. SUMITANI discovered a bug and fixed it. > The problem was that we got worng gdt pointer for the current cpu, > then panic... > The followings is a patch to fix the probl

Re: SMP + APM = panic -> fixed!

2000-06-06 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
> > Please test this and I'll commit & MFC this if we have no problem with > > this fix. > > I don't have an SMP + APM system around at the moment, but the > fix does look correct to me, go ahead and commit it. Thanks for > tracking this down! Thank you for reviewing this. I'm going to comit t

Re: SMP + APM = panic -> fixed!

2000-06-06 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 02:06:15AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > > We're having this problem for long time (from the old 4.0-CURRENT > days), but Mr. SUMITANI discovered a bug and fixed it. > The problem was that we got worng gdt pointer for the current cpu, > then panic... > The followings is