Hi Jeff
I checked in a fix for this at revision 207742. If you can verify that it
works for you it would be appreciated.
Sorry for long delay, finally, I've updated to recent sources, looks like no
more such panics so far.
Will test under more load.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
Vladimir B.
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
Hi
While 'make buildworld'
kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.13
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Hi Vladimir,
I checked in a fix for this at revision 207742. If you can verify that it
works for you it would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Jeff
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:37:00PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote:
Hello,
I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the
following bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it.
I've noticed that when trying to enable a feature on a mounted
filesystem tunefs gives a bogus
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Ed Maste wrote:
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:32:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I also don't want to bikeshed this to death. I imagine that once the
feature is stable that users will just twiddle it once and then leave it
alone, or it will be set at install time and then not
Quoting sth...@nethelp.no (from Sun, 02 May 2010 07:38:57 +0200 (CEST)):
When you disable journaling it also disables soft-updates. You need to
re-enable it. I could decouple this. It's hard to say which is the POLA.
I would vote for decoupling. If I have SU on, then enable journaling,
On May 3, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting sth...@nethelp.no (from Sun, 02 May 2010 07:38:57 +0200 (CEST)):
When you disable journaling it also disables soft-updates. You need to
re-enable it. I could decouple this. It's hard to say which is the POLA.
I would
I would vote for decoupling. If I have SU on, then enable journaling,
then disable journaling, I would expect SU to still be on.
Fully agreed. I see no reason why these sould be coupled.
It does not look like it is a prerequisite to have SU enabled when you
want to enable SUJ. So I
On 05/03/10 06:19, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
I would vote for decoupling. If I have SU on, then enable journaling,
then disable journaling, I would expect SU to still be on.
Fully agreed. I see no reason why these sould be coupled.
It does not look like it is a prerequisite to have SU enabled
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:32:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I also don't want to bikeshed this to death. I imagine that once the
feature is stable that users will just twiddle it once and then leave it
alone, or it will be set at install time and then not twiddled at all. :)
Speaking of
Hi
While 'make buildworld'
kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.13
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
...
#0 0xc056b93c in doadump ()
(kgdb) bt
#0 0xc056b93c in doadump ()
#1 0xc0489019 in db_fncall ()
#2 0xc0489411 in db_command ()
#3 0xc048956a in db_command_loop ()
#4 0xc048b3ed in db_trap
Hi Jeff,
Before sending the 'bad' part i would like to say that it is very useful and
save me a lot of time after a crash.
I've updated the ports and there was no more space on the FS.
It end up with this backtrace (After one reboot the kernel crashed a second
time with the same
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Before sending the 'bad' part i would like to say that it is very useful and
save me a lot of time after a crash.
I've updated the ports and there was no more space on the FS.
It end up with this backtrace (After one reboot the kernel
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
Hi
While 'make buildworld'
This is a problem with snapshots and the journal full condition. I will
address it shortly.
Thanks,
Jeff
kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.13
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
...
#0 0xc056b93c in doadump ()
I've rev 207213 installed, i will update.
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Before sending the 'bad' part i would like to say that it is very useful and
save me a lot of time after a crash.
I've updated the ports and there was no more space on the FS.
It end up
Hi
Ehh, looks like fresh kernel is not too stable, it holds after some time
of activity.
DDB may be activated, but even 'call cpu_reset' does nothing here.
Looks like it is not related to SUJ, it happens even with SUJ disabled.
Does reverting r207410 + r207412 help ?
No, it does
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:37:00PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the
following bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it.
I've started seeing a panic Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable lock,
though it seems to be occurring
On Sat, 1 May 2010, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:37:00PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the
following bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it.
I've started seeing a panic Sleeping thread owns a non-sleepable
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Bruce Cran bru...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:37:00PM -1000, Jeff Roberson wrote:
I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the
following bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it.
I've started seeing a panic
On Sunday 02 May 2010 02:16:35 Alan Cox wrote:
Are you running an up to date kernel, specifically, one from today? If
not, please update. Kip committed some fixes throughout the day
yesterday.
I was running a kernel from Friday - I've now updated to the latest sources
and the panic has
On 05/01/10 18:10, Jeff Roberson wrote:
When you disable journaling it also disables soft-updates. You need to
re-enable it. I could decouple this. It's hard to say which is the POLA.
I would vote for decoupling. If I have SU on, then enable journaling,
then disable journaling, I would
When you disable journaling it also disables soft-updates. You need to
re-enable it. I could decouple this. It's hard to say which is the POLA.
I would vote for decoupling. If I have SU on, then enable journaling,
then disable journaling, I would expect SU to still be on.
Fully agreed.
Hi
1) now works for me (no panics so far)
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net
To: curr...@freebsd.org
Subject: SUJ update
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:37:00 -1000 (HST)
Hello,
I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the following
bugs
...@fbsd.ru
Reply-to: v...@fbsd.ru
To: Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net
Cc: curr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SUJ update
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:36:10 +0400
Hi
1) now works for me (no panics so far)
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net
To: curr...@freebsd.org
with SUJ disabled.
Does reverting r207410 + r207412 help ?
-Original Message-
From: Vladimir Grebenschikov v...@fbsd.ru
Reply-to: v...@fbsd.ru
To: Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net
Cc: curr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SUJ update
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:36:10 +0400
Hi
1
On 30 April 2010 08:37, Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net wrote:
Hello,
I fixed a few SUJ bugs. If those of you who reported one of the following
bugs could re-test I would greatly appreciate it.
1) panic on gnome start via softdep_cancel_link().
2) Difficulty setting flags on /.
Hi
1h - flight ok
-Original Message-
From: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
To: Vladimir Grebenschikov v...@fbsd.ru
Cc: Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net, curr...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SUJ update
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:49:34 +0300
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 02:43:49PM +0400
just a little request
# tunefs
usage: tunefs [-A] [-a enable | disable] [-e maxbpg] [-f avgfilesize]
[-J enable | disable ] [-L volname] [-l enable | disable]
[-m minfree] [-N enable | disable] [-n enable | disable]
[-o space | time] [-p] [-s avgfpdir]
27 matches
Mail list logo
