Re: Speaking of ship blockers for 9....

2012-08-14 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: I Jul 22 08:54:25 brane kernel: pf: state key linking mismatch! dir=OUT, if= I tun0, stored af=2, a0: 10.0.2.220:60985, a1: 192.41.162.30:53, proto=17, I found af=2, a0: 41.154.2.53:1701, a1: 41.133.165.161:59051, proto=17. Let me give you link to my branch of pf:

Re: Speaking of ship blockers for 9....

2012-08-11 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Let me give you link to my branch of pf: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2012-June/006643.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2012-June/006662.html In that branch the code that puts the reverse pointer on state keys, as well as the

Re: Speaking of ship blockers for 9....

2012-08-09 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Ian, On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 08:17:56PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: I I have a problem that's been getting progressively worse as the I source progresses. So much so that it's had me searching all the I way from 8.0-RELEASE to 10-CURRENT without luck on both amd64 and I i386. I I pf(4)

Re: Speaking of ship blockers for 9....

2012-08-07 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Aug 7, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Ian FREISLICH i...@clue.co.za wrote: Garrett Cooper Is this is in 9.1 -PRERELEASE, -RELEASE (or whatever the official label is...)? If so, it seems like this would be a ship blocker. I have a problem that's been getting progressively worse as the source

Re: Speaking of ship blockers for 9....

2012-08-07 Thread matt
On 08/07/12 11:43, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Aug 7, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Ian FREISLICH i...@clue.co.za wrote: Garrett Cooper Is this is in 9.1 -PRERELEASE, -RELEASE (or whatever the official label is...)? If so, it seems like this would be a ship blocker. I have a problem that's been