Re: Time counter broken?

2002-03-29 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ollivier Robert wri tes: >According to Poul-Henning Kamp: >> I think I found a mistake I made, can you try this patch please ? > >Rev. 1.118 of kern_tc.c fixed the problem, thanks. Great. Sorry for the trouble. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus

Re: Time counter broken?

2002-03-29 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Poul-Henning Kamp: > I think I found a mistake I made, can you try this patch please ? Rev. 1.118 of kern_tc.c fixed the problem, thanks. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- Eurocontrol EEC/ITM -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr 5.0-CURRENT #46: Wed Jan 3 15:52:00 CET 200

Re: Time counter broken?

2002-03-28 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
>This patch is broken because it doesn't fix the comment, which should >read > ... 4398 / 2048 is very close to ideal. The commited version is better :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD

Re: Time counter broken?

2002-03-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : I think I found a mistake I made, can you try this patch please ? : : Index: kern_tc.c : === : RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/kern_tc.c

Re: Time counter broken?

2002-03-28 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Poul-Henning Kamp: > I think I found a mistake I made, can you try this patch please ? I have not seen the message yet but I have the impression my clock is getting further and further behind my NTP server. remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitt

Re: Time counter broken?

2002-03-28 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I think I found a mistake I made, can you try this patch please ? Index: kern_tc.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/kern_tc.c,v retrieving revision 1.117 diff -u -r1.117 kern_tc.c --- kern_tc.c 19 Mar 2002 21:24:06 -

Re: Time counter broken?

2002-03-28 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Hmm, I'll look closer at this. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM

Re: Time counter broken?

2002-03-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 09:38:49AM +0100, Ollivier Robert wrote: > Since I upgraded to my CURRENT machine into two days ago sources, I'm > getting this from ntpd. > > Mar 28 07:37:03 caerdonn ntpd[171]: time reset -1.151848 s > Mar 28 08:00:47 caerdonn ntpd[171]: time reset -1.222628 s > Mar 28 0

Re: Time counter broken?

2002-03-28 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
My best guess would be that your bios plays power-management tricks with your CPU frequency... Alternatively, since this is -current: that something is truly and utterly dysfunctional right now. Poul-Henning In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ollivier Robert wr ites: >According to Poul-Henning Ka

Re: Time counter broken?

2002-03-28 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Poul-Henning Kamp: > output from > dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #13: Tue Mar 26 17:48:0

Re: Time counter broken?

2002-03-28 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ollivier Robert wr ites: >Since I upgraded to my CURRENT machine into two days ago sources, I'm >getting this from ntpd. > >Mar 28 07:37:03 caerdonn ntpd[171]: time reset -1.151848 s >Mar 28 08:00:47 caerdonn ntpd[171]: time reset -1.222628 s output from d