Peter Dufault wrote:
This seems to only do the cdevsw_add if the malloc failed. I presume
this is the opposit of the intended sense. I'll fix it up if you also
think it looks wrong.
If nobody have noticed in "17 months, 2 weeks ago" (as cvs-web says)
that labpc doesn't work,
For the record: If anyone wants labpc tested and kept up to date send
me a card and I'll test it at each stable release cycle. Even better,
also send me the register compatible DAQCARD 1200 PC card version.
My former client using a batch of those cards obviously
isn't staying up to
Peter Dufault wrote:
For the record: If anyone wants labpc tested and kept up to date send
me a card and I'll test it at each stable release cycle. Even better,
also send me the register compatible DAQCARD 1200 PC card version.
My former client using a batch of those cards
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Malone writes:
I noticed the following while looking through the M_ZERO patches.
When you were cleaning up some dev stuff you made the following
change to labpc.c (revision 1.33):
labpcs = malloc(NLABPC * sizeof(struct ctlr *), M_DEVBUF, M_NOWAIT);
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Malone writes:
I noticed the following while looking through the M_ZERO patches.
When you were cleaning up some dev stuff you made the following
change to labpc.c (revision 1.33):
labpcs = malloc(NLABPC *
