- Jeff Roberson's Original Message -
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > Does this mean that if, as a temporary measure, I disable
> > machdep.cpu_idle_hlt, ULE should work for me?
> >
> Yes, but it needs to be disabled before booting so you'll have to adjust
> it in the code
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Jeff Roberson writes:
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 27-Jun-2003 Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Jeff Roberson writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you call kseq_print(0) and kseq_print(1) from ddb?
> > >
On 28-Jun-2003 Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>>
>> On 27-Jun-2003 Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>> >
>> > Jeff Roberson writes:
>> > >
>> > > Can you call kseq_print(0) and kseq_print(1) from ddb?
>> > >
>> >
>> > I found a different problem which is nearly as inte
Jeff Roberson writes:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> >
> > On 27-Jun-2003 Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > >
> > > Jeff Roberson writes:
> > > >
> > > > Can you call kseq_print(0) and kseq_print(1) from ddb?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I found a different problem which is nearly a
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 27-Jun-2003 Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> >
> > Jeff Roberson writes:
> > >
> > > Can you call kseq_print(0) and kseq_print(1) from ddb?
> > >
> >
> > I found a different problem which is nearly as interesting.
> > Note that ps thinks sysctl is on cpu
On 27-Jun-2003 Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Jeff Roberson writes:
> >
> > Can you call kseq_print(0) and kseq_print(1) from ddb?
> >
>
> I found a different problem which is nearly as interesting.
> Note that ps thinks sysctl is on cpu 255...
#define NOCPU 0xff/* For when we ar
Jeff Roberson writes:
>
> Can you call kseq_print(0) and kseq_print(1) from ddb?
>
I found a different problem which is nearly as interesting.
Note that ps thinks sysctl is on cpu 255...
Boot hangs here:
cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not
present
SMP: AP CPU
Jeff Roberson writes:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> >
> > Jeff,
> >
> > On an "SMP" box I have, which is really a p4 box with one physical
> > CPU, and 2 HTT cores, I've seen some strange behaviour with ULE.
> > With ULE enabled, I've see jobs "wedge" for no apparent
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Jeff,
>
> On an "SMP" box I have, which is really a p4 box with one physical
> CPU, and 2 HTT cores, I've seen some strange behaviour with ULE.
> With ULE enabled, I've see jobs "wedge" for no apparent reason.
> Some examples are fsck, dhclient and
