On 12/1/11 5:04 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/11/2011 02:38 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
you (committers)
I wonder how it would work out if you were made a committer and couldn't say
"you (committers)" any more... :-)
The rea
on 02/12/2011 03:04 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 14/11/2011 02:38 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
>>> you (committers)
>>
>> I wonder how it would work out if you were made a committer and couldn't say
>> "you (committe
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/11/2011 02:38 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
>> you (committers)
>
> I wonder how it would work out if you were made a committer and couldn't say
> "you (committers)" any more... :-)
>
The real question is rather whether or not
on 14/11/2011 02:38 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
> you (committers)
I wonder how it would work out if you were made a committer and couldn't say
"you (committers)" any more... :-) I.e. is it possible to change your mindset
from "me (and us) versus you" to just "us"? The lines between commi
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/8/11 9:29 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> [...]
>
>> However, if you want to know, my heart tends to be with BSDs.
>> Unfortunately, it's a sad love-story where your Beloved keeps
>> deceiving you day after day. You want to change sm
On 10/11/2011, at 4:09, Julian Elischer wrote:
> well write a driver for it.. what do you think I'm doing with the driver I'm
> talking about?
> I wrote several bypass network card drivers when I was at cisco/ironport..
> it's not rocket science,
> though it would be nice if we were to come up w
On 11/8/11 9:29 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/8/11 5:52 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Julian Elischer
wrote:
On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
To avoid future complaints about the fa
On 11/9/11, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> On 11/8/11 5:52 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Julian Elischer
>>> wrote:
On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/8/11 5:52 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Julian Elischer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
To avoid future complaints about the fact that I
On 11/8/11 5:52 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be only "talk"
without "action", I did implement what I suggested above. As it is
quite a
On 11/8/11 5:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 1
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be only "talk"
>> without "action", I did implement what I suggested above. As it is
>> quite a large patch-set, I will not p
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> [cc list trimmed]
>>
>> on 08/11/2011 22:34 Attilio Rao said the following:
>>> 2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe :
To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Ko
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> [cc list trimmed]
>
> on 08/11/2011 22:34 Attilio Rao said the following:
>> 2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe :
>>> To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be only "talk"
>>> without "action", I did implement what I suggested abov
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be only "talk"
>> without "action", I did implement what I suggested above. As it is
>> quite a large patch-set, I will not p
On 11/8/11 10:49 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be only "talk"
without "action", I did implement what I suggested above. As it is
quite a large patch-set, I will not post it directly here, however, it
is available on github:
https://github.co
[cc list trimmed]
on 08/11/2011 22:34 Attilio Rao said the following:
> 2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe :
>> To avoid future complaints about the fact that I would be only "talk"
>> without "action", I did implement what I suggested above. As it is
>> quite a large patch-set, I will not post it directly
2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe :
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kostik Belousov
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:03:39P
19 matches
Mail list logo
