On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
>> In the last episode (Apr 08), Garrett Cooper said:
>>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>>> > On Apr 8, 2010, at 2:18 PM, krad wrote:
>>> > [ ... ]
>>> >>> is that even pos
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Apr 08), Garrett Cooper said:
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> > On Apr 8, 2010, at 2:18 PM, krad wrote:
>> > [ ... ]
>> >>> is that even possible with CDDL?
>> >>
>> >> im not a lawyer but it wouldn
In the last episode (Apr 08), Garrett Cooper said:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 2010, at 2:18 PM, krad wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> >>> is that even possible with CDDL?
> >>
> >> im not a lawyer but it wouldn't surprise me
> >
> > I'm not a lawyer either, but I was a
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On Apr 8, 2010, at 2:18 PM, krad wrote:
> [ ... ]
>>> is that even possible with CDDL?
>>>
>>
>> im not a lawyer but it wouldn't surprise me
>
> I'm not a lawyer either, but I was active in reviewing and suggesting changes
> to CDDL s
Hi--
On Apr 8, 2010, at 2:18 PM, krad wrote:
[ ... ]
>> is that even possible with CDDL?
>>
>
> im not a lawyer but it wouldn't surprise me
I'm not a lawyer either, but I was active in reviewing and suggesting changes
to CDDL submission for OSI approval back in 2004.
A copyright owner always
On 8 April 2010 17:47, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> > ZFS is still currently in heavy development so it might happen. Having
> siad
> > that it looks like oracle have totally buggered it up for everyone with
> > their retroactive licenses. I hope the CDL was tight enough that stuff
> wont
> > have to
> ZFS is still currently in heavy development so it might happen. Having siad
> that it looks like oracle have totally buggered it up for everyone with
> their retroactive licenses. I hope the CDL was tight enough that stuff wont
> have to get pulled from freebsd
is that even possible with CDDL?
On 7 April 2010 18:33, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Apr 07), krad said:
> > On 7 April 2010 05:38, Freddie Cash wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:35 PM, lhmwzy wrote:
> > > > What's your mean??
> > >
> > > See the archives for the freebsd-fs mailing list. There are two
> > > se
In the last episode (Apr 07), krad said:
> On 7 April 2010 05:38, Freddie Cash wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:35 PM, lhmwzy wrote:
> > > What's your mean??
> >
> > See the archives for the freebsd-fs mailing list. There are two
> > separate groups working on getting ZFSv22 added to FreeBSD
On 7 April 2010 05:38, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:35 PM, lhmwzy wrote:
>
> > What's your mean??
> >
>
> See the archives for the freebsd-fs mailing list. There are two separate
> groups working on getting ZFSv22 added to FreeBSD 9-CURRENT. And there's
> work ongoing to get
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:35 PM, lhmwzy wrote:
> What's your mean??
>
See the archives for the freebsd-fs mailing list. There are two separate
groups working on getting ZFSv22 added to FreeBSD 9-CURRENT. And there's
work ongoing to get ZFSv15 added to FreeBSD 8-STABLE.
IOW, just be patient. G
What's your mean??
2010/4/7 Sam Fourman Jr. :
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:26 PM, lhmwzy wrote:
>> I found the zfs on FreeBSD is still V13
>> When will we can use ZFS v24?
>
> I believe that patches for ZFS v22 is being worked on atm.
>
> Sam Fourman Jr.
> Fourman Networks
>
__
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:26 PM, lhmwzy wrote:
> I found the zfs on FreeBSD is still V13
> When will we can use ZFS v24?
I believe that patches for ZFS v22 is being worked on atm.
Sam Fourman Jr.
Fourman Networks
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
13 matches
Mail list logo
